Dorothy A Andriole1, Donna B Jeffe, Alison J Whelan. 1. Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8073, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. andrioled@msnotes.wustl.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Variables associated with postgraduate year 1 (PGY-l) performance in surgical training have not been fully defined. METHODS: Mean composite PGY-l evaluation scores were calculated from responses to questionnaires mailed to surgical program directors of 87 surgical graduates from 1997 to 2001. We analyzed evaluation scores for associations with sex, surgical specialty choice, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 and step 2 scores, Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) election, and third-year clerkships' grade point average (GPA). RESULTS: There were significant first-order associations between PGY-l performance evaluation score and each of USMLE step 2 score and GPA. In a multiple linear regression model that included sex, surgical specialty choice, USMLE step l and step 2 scores, AOA, and GPA, USMLE step 2 score was the only significant predictor of PGY-l performance. CONCLUSIONS: Multiinstitutional studies are warranted to determine the predictive value of USMLE step 2 scores in residency performance beyond PGY-l and to identify other predictors of surgical PGY-l performance.
BACKGROUND: Variables associated with postgraduate year 1 (PGY-l) performance in surgical training have not been fully defined. METHODS: Mean composite PGY-l evaluation scores were calculated from responses to questionnaires mailed to surgical program directors of 87 surgical graduates from 1997 to 2001. We analyzed evaluation scores for associations with sex, surgical specialty choice, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 and step 2 scores, Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) election, and third-year clerkships' grade point average (GPA). RESULTS: There were significant first-order associations between PGY-l performance evaluation score and each of USMLE step 2 score and GPA. In a multiple linear regression model that included sex, surgical specialty choice, USMLE step l and step 2 scores, AOA, and GPA, USMLE step 2 score was the only significant predictor of PGY-l performance. CONCLUSIONS: Multiinstitutional studies are warranted to determine the predictive value of USMLE step 2 scores in residency performance beyond PGY-l and to identify other predictors of surgical PGY-l performance.
Authors: David L Greenburg; Steven J Durning; Daniel L Cohen; David Cruess; Jeffrey L Jackson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: James H Herndon; Bassan J Allan; George Dyer; Andrew Jawa; David Zurakowski Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Michael W Cullen; Darcy A Reed; Andrew J Halvorsen; Christopher M Wittich; Lisa M Baumann Kreuziger; Mira T Keddis; Furman S McDonald; Thomas J Beckman Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Katherine B Lee; Sanjeev N Vaishnavi; Steven K M Lau; Dorothy A Andriole; Donna B Jeffe Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Michael W Cullen; Thomas J Beckman; Kristine M Baldwin; Gregory J Engstler; Jay Mandrekar; Christopher G Scott; Kyle W Klarich Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2020-08-01
Authors: Peter T Cangialosi; Brian C Chung; Torin P Thielhelm; Nicholas D Camarda; Dylan S Eiger Journal: Acad Med Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 7.840