Literature DB >> 15249109

Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans.

Alessandro Cellerino1, Davide Borghetti, Ferdinando Sartucci.   

Abstract

Human faces are ecologically-salient stimuli. Face sex is particularly relevant for human interactions and face gender recognition is an extremely efficient cognitive process that is acquired early during childhood. To measure the minimum information required for correct gender classification, we have used a pixelation filter and reduced frontal pictures (28,672 pixels) of male and female faces to 7168, 1792, 448 and 112 pixels. We then addressed the following questions: Is gender recognition of male and female faces equally efficient? Are male and female subjects equally efficient at recognising face gender? We found a striking difference in categorisation of male and female faces. Categorisation of female faces reduced to 1792 pixels is at chance level whereas categorisation of male faces is above chance even for 112 pixel images. In addition, the same difference in the efficiency of categorisation of male and female faces was detected using a Gaussian noise filter. A clear sex difference in the efficiency of face gender categorisation was detected as well. Female subject were more efficient in recognising female faces. These results indicate that recognition of male and female faces are different cognitive processes and that in general females are more efficient in this cognitive task. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249109     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  20 in total

1.  Visual kin recognition in nonhuman primates: (Pan troglodytes and Macaca mulatta): inbreeding avoidance or male distinctiveness?

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Elizabeth Lonsdorf; Emily Wroblewski
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  The conditioning and extinction of fear in youths: what's sex got to do with it?

Authors:  Mélissa Chauret; Valérie La Buissonnière-Ariza; Vickie Lamoureux Tremblay; Sabrina Suffren; Alice Servonnet; Daniel S Pine; Françoise S Maheu
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Cortical responses to self and others.

Authors:  Amra Hodzic; Lars Muckli; Wolf Singer; Aglaja Stirn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Diffusion properties of major white matter tracts in young, typically developing children.

Authors:  Ryan T Johnson; Jason D Yeatman; Brian A Wandell; Michael H Buonocore; David G Amaral; Christine Wu Nordahl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The roles of featural and configural face processing in snap judgments of sexual orientation.

Authors:  Joshua A Tabak; Vivian Zayas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Age-dependent face detection and face categorization performance.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon; Martina Grüter; Thomas Grüter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hands as sex cues: sensitivity measures, male bias measures, and implications for sex perception mechanisms.

Authors:  Justin Gaetano; Rick van der Zwan; Duncan Blair; Anna Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Men perform comparably to women in a perspective taking task after administration of intranasal oxytocin but not after placebo.

Authors:  Angeliki Theodoridou; Angela C Rowe; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Differentiated brain activity in response to faces of "own" versus "unfamiliar" babies in primipara mothers: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Marc H Bornstein; Martha E Arterberry; Clay Mash
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.113

10.  A critical role of holistic processing in face gender perception.

Authors:  Takemasa Yokoyama; Yasuki Noguchi; Ryosuke Tachibana; Shigeru Mukaida; Shinichi Kita
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.