Literature DB >> 15249085

Functional outcomes in young, active duty, military personnel after submuscular ulnar nerve transposition.

Brian T Fitzgerald1, Khiem D Dao, Alexander Y Shin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report on the results of submuscular ulnar nerve transposition (SMUNT) for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome in a young, active duty, military population.
METHODS: Twenty patients (20 extremities) were evaluated retrospectively a minimum of 12 months after surgery. Outcome analyses were performed using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Bishop-Kleinman rating scales, physical examination, return-to-work analysis, evaluation of complication rate, and overall patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: At an average follow-up evaluation of 24 months (range, 12-38 mo), 19 patients had returned to full military active duty work status. The average duration of limited work capacity after surgery was 4.8 months (range, 3-7 mo). The DASH scores improved from an average of 32.5 points before surgery to 6.2 points after surgery. In 19 patients the functional outcome evaluated with the Bishop-Kleinman rating system was excellent. There were no poor outcomes using this rating score. Statistically significant improvements in both key pinch and grip strength were noted. Complications included one permanent and 2 transient neuropraxias of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Overall 19 of 20 patients were satisfied with the procedure and would have the surgery again if required.
CONCLUSIONS: Submuscular ulnar nerve transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome provides a reliable rate of return to full active duty work in military personnel with good patient satisfaction and minimal complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249085     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  5 in total

1.  [Is intraoperative luxation of the ulnar nerve a criterion for transposition?].

Authors:  A Kraus; N Sinis; F Werdin; H-E Schaller
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Steven Cutts
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  How to measure outcomes of peripheral nerve surgery.

Authors:  Yirong Wang; Malay Sunitha; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  IS RDW A PREDICTIVE PARAMETER FOR CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME PATIENTS REQUIRING SURGERY?

Authors:  Hakan Sarman; Cengiz Isik; Mehmet Boz; Ismail Boyraz; Bunyamin Koc; Sule Aydin Turkoglu
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

5.  Postoperative improvement in DASH score, clinical findings, and nerve conduction velocity in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Ido; Shigeharu Uchiyama; Koichi Nakamura; Toshiro Itsubo; Masanori Hayashi; Yukihiko Hata; Toshihiko Imaeda; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.