OBJECTIVE: Two methods to assess liver echogenicity were compared. METHODS: Liver/kidney echogenicity ratio was measured in 41 persons with the ultrasound software and visually graded by two radiologists and a radiographer. These echogenicity ratios and grades were related to risk factors for fatty liver and to liver enzyme levels. RESULTS: These determinants explained 55% of the radiologists' mean grades, 14% of the radiographer's and 31% of the measured echogenicity ratios. CONCLUSION: Radiologists' visual gradings correlated best with the indirect determinants of early liver pathology. Computerized measurements may be inferior to visual grading due to the lack of holistic tissue diagnostics.
OBJECTIVE: Two methods to assess liver echogenicity were compared. METHODS: Liver/kidney echogenicity ratio was measured in 41 persons with the ultrasound software and visually graded by two radiologists and a radiographer. These echogenicity ratios and grades were related to risk factors for fatty liver and to liver enzyme levels. RESULTS: These determinants explained 55% of the radiologists' mean grades, 14% of the radiographer's and 31% of the measured echogenicity ratios. CONCLUSION: Radiologists' visual gradings correlated best with the indirect determinants of early liver pathology. Computerized measurements may be inferior to visual grading due to the lack of holistic tissue diagnostics.
Authors: Aliya Qayyum; Daryl M Chen; Richard S Breiman; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh; Kirk D Jones; Ying Lu; Fergus V Coakley; Peter W Callen Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.605