Literature DB >> 15248733

Effect of stamp deformation on the quality of microcontact printing: theory and experiment.

Kenneth G Sharp1, Gregory S Blackman, Nicholas J Glassmaker, Anand Jagota, Chung-Yuen Hui.   

Abstract

Microcontact printing (microCP) is an effective way to generate micrometer- or submicrometer-sized patterns on a variety of substrates. However, the fidelity of the final pattern depends critically on the coupled phenomena of stamp deformation, fluid transfer between surfaces, and the ability of the ink to self-assemble on the substrate. In particular, stamp deformation can produce undesirable effects that limit the practice and precision of microCP. Experimental observations and comparison with theoretical predictions are presented here for three of the most undesirable consequences of stamp deformation: (1) roof collapse of low aspect ratio recesses, (2) buckling of high aspect ratio plates, and (3) lateral sticking of high aspect ratio plates. Stamp behavior was observed visually with an inverted optical microscope while load-displacement data were collected during compression and retraction of stamps. Additionally, a "robotic stamper" was used to deliver ink patterns in precise locations on substrates. These monomolecular ink patterns were then observed in high contrast using the surface potential scanning mode of an atomic force microscope. Theoretical models based on continuum mechanics were used to accurately predict both physical deformation of the stamp and the resultant inking patterns. The close agreement between these models and the experimental data presented clearly demonstrates the essential considerations one must weigh when designing stamp geometry, material, and loading conditions for optimal pattern fidelity. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society

Year:  2004        PMID: 15248733     DOI: 10.1021/la036332+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  8 in total

1.  Topographically flat, chemically patterned PDMS stamps made by dip-pen nanolithography.

Authors:  Zijian Zheng; Jae-Won Jang; Gengfeng Zheng; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Nanoarrays of Individual Liposomes and Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles by Liftoff Nanocontact Printing.

Authors:  Jennie L Cawley; Megan E Blauch; Shannon M Collins; Justin B Nice; Qing Xie; Luke R Jordan; Angela C Brown; Nathan J Wittenberg
Journal:  Small       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 13.281

3.  High fidelity nanopatterning of proteins onto well-defined surfaces through subtractive contact printing.

Authors:  José R García; Ankur Singh; Andrés J García
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.441

4.  Adhesive micro-line periodicity determines guidance of axonal outgrowth.

Authors:  Steven R Hart; Yu Huang; Thomas Fothergill; Derek C Lumbard; Erik W Dent; Justin C Williams
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Flexure-based Roll-to-roll Platform: A Practical Solution for Realizing Large-area Microcontact Printing.

Authors:  Xi Zhou; Huihua Xu; Jiyi Cheng; Ni Zhao; Shih-Chi Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Protein patterning by microcontact printing using pyramidal PDMS stamps.

Authors:  Luisa Filipponi; Peter Livingston; Ondřej Kašpar; Viola Tokárová; Dan V Nicolau
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.838

7.  Wettability of semispherical droplets on layered elastic gradient soft substrates.

Authors:  Yonglin Yang; Xing Li; Wenshuai Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  High-Resolution Rapid Prototyping of Liquid Metal Electronics by Direct Writing on Highly Prestretched Substrates.

Authors:  Bo Liang; Jinwei Wei; Lu Fang; Qingpeng Cao; Tingting Tu; Hangxu Ren; Xuesong Ye
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-12-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.