PURPOSE: Particle migration, poor shape definition and/or rapid resorption limit the success of current urethral bulking agents. We propose that shape defining porous scaffolds that allow cell infiltration and anchoring, and may be delivered in a minimally invasive manner may provide many advantageous features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alginate hydrogels were prepared with varying degrees of covalent cross-linking and different pore characteristics. Dehydrated scaffolds were compressed into smaller, temporary forms, introduced into the dorsal subcutaneous space of CD-1 mice by minimally invasive delivery through a 10 gauge angiocatheter and rehydrated in situ with a saline solution delivered through the same catheter. Ionically cross-linked calcium alginate gel served as a control. Specimens were harvested at 2, 6, 12 and 24 weeks to evaluate implant shape retention and volume, cell infiltration and calcification, and the presence of an inflammatory response. RESULTS: A total of 90 scaffolds were implanted and 95% were recovered at the site of injection. All of these scaffolds successfully rehydrated and 80% recovered and maintained their original 3-dimensional shape for 6 months. Scaffold volume and tissue infiltration varied depending on the degree of alginate cross-linking. Highly cross-linked materials (20% and 35%) demonstrated the best volume maintenance with the latter facilitating the most tissue infiltration. The inflammatory response was minimal except with the 80% cross-linked material. Calcification was not observed in covalently cross-linked scaffolds. In contrast, 98% of calcium alginate implants were calcified. CONCLUSIONS: Shape retaining porous hydrogels meet many of the requirements necessary for a successful injectable bulking agent and offer advantages over currently used agents.
PURPOSE: Particle migration, poor shape definition and/or rapid resorption limit the success of current urethral bulking agents. We propose that shape defining porous scaffolds that allow cell infiltration and anchoring, and may be delivered in a minimally invasive manner may provide many advantageous features. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Alginate hydrogels were prepared with varying degrees of covalent cross-linking and different pore characteristics. Dehydrated scaffolds were compressed into smaller, temporary forms, introduced into the dorsal subcutaneous space of CD-1mice by minimally invasive delivery through a 10 gauge angiocatheter and rehydrated in situ with a saline solution delivered through the same catheter. Ionically cross-linked calcium alginate gel served as a control. Specimens were harvested at 2, 6, 12 and 24 weeks to evaluate implant shape retention and volume, cell infiltration and calcification, and the presence of an inflammatory response. RESULTS: A total of 90 scaffolds were implanted and 95% were recovered at the site of injection. All of these scaffolds successfully rehydrated and 80% recovered and maintained their original 3-dimensional shape for 6 months. Scaffold volume and tissue infiltration varied depending on the degree of alginate cross-linking. Highly cross-linked materials (20% and 35%) demonstrated the best volume maintenance with the latter facilitating the most tissue infiltration. The inflammatory response was minimal except with the 80% cross-linked material. Calcification was not observed in covalently cross-linked scaffolds. In contrast, 98% of calcium alginate implants were calcified. CONCLUSIONS: Shape retaining porous hydrogels meet many of the requirements necessary for a successful injectable bulking agent and offer advantages over currently used agents.
Authors: Xuanhe Zhao; Jaeyun Kim; Christine A Cezar; Nathaniel Huebsch; Kangwon Lee; Kamal Bouhadir; David J Mooney Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sidi A Bencherif; R Warren Sands; Deen Bhatta; Praveen Arany; Catia S Verbeke; David A Edwards; David J Mooney Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher S D Lee; Hunter R Moyer; Rolando A I Gittens; Joseph K Williams; Adele L Boskey; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2010-04-02 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Ellen T Roche; Conn L Hastings; Sarah A Lewin; Dmitry Shvartsman; Yevgeny Brudno; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Fergal J O'Brien; Conor J Walsh; Garry P Duffy; David J Mooney Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 12.479