BACKGROUND: Free and total human kallikrein 2 (hK2) might improve the discrimination between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Concentrations of hK2 are 100-fold lower than concentrations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA); therefore, an hK2 assay must have a low detection limit and good specificity. METHODS: PSA- and hK2-specific monoclonal antibodies were used in solid-phase, two-site immunofluorometric assays to detect free and total hK2. The total hK2 assay used PSA-specific antibodies to block nonspecific signal. The capture antibody of the free hK2 assay did not cross-react with PSA. To determine the hK2 concentrations in the male bloodstream, total hK2 was measured in a control group consisting of 426 noncharacterized serum samples. Free and total hK2 were measured in plasma from 103 patients with confirmed prostate cancer. RESULTS: All 426 males in the control group had a total hK2 concentration above the detection limit of 0.0008 microg/L. The median total hK2 concentration was 0.022 microg/L (range, 0.0015-0.37 microg/L). hK2 concentrations were 0.1-58% of total PSA (median, 3.6%). hK2 concentrations were similar in men 41-50 and 51-60 years of age. The ratio of hK2 to PSA steadily decreased from 5-30% at PSA <1 microg/L to 1-2% at higher PSA concentrations. In 103 patients with prostate cancer, the median hK2 concentration in plasma was 0.079 microg/L (range, 0.0015-16.2 microg/L). The median free hK2 concentration was 0.070 (range, 0.005-12.2) microg/L. The proportion of free to total hK2 varied from 17% to 131% (mean, 85%). CONCLUSIONS: The wide variation in the free-to-total hK2 ratio suggests that hK2 in blood plasma is not consistently in the free, noncomplexed form in patients with prostate cancer. The new assay is sufficiently sensitive to be used to study the diagnostic accuracies of free and total hK2 for prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND: Free and total humankallikrein 2 (hK2) might improve the discrimination between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Concentrations of hK2 are 100-fold lower than concentrations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA); therefore, an hK2 assay must have a low detection limit and good specificity. METHODS:PSA- and hK2-specific monoclonal antibodies were used in solid-phase, two-site immunofluorometric assays to detect free and total hK2. The total hK2 assay used PSA-specific antibodies to block nonspecific signal. The capture antibody of the free hK2 assay did not cross-react with PSA. To determine the hK2 concentrations in the male bloodstream, total hK2 was measured in a control group consisting of 426 noncharacterized serum samples. Free and total hK2 were measured in plasma from 103 patients with confirmed prostate cancer. RESULTS: All 426 males in the control group had a total hK2 concentration above the detection limit of 0.0008 microg/L. The median total hK2 concentration was 0.022 microg/L (range, 0.0015-0.37 microg/L). hK2 concentrations were 0.1-58% of total PSA (median, 3.6%). hK2 concentrations were similar in men 41-50 and 51-60 years of age. The ratio of hK2 to PSA steadily decreased from 5-30% at PSA <1 microg/L to 1-2% at higher PSA concentrations. In 103 patients with prostate cancer, the median hK2 concentration in plasma was 0.079 microg/L (range, 0.0015-16.2 microg/L). The median free hK2 concentration was 0.070 (range, 0.005-12.2) microg/L. The proportion of free to total hK2 varied from 17% to 131% (mean, 85%). CONCLUSIONS: The wide variation in the free-to-total hK2 ratio suggests that hK2 in blood plasma is not consistently in the free, noncomplexed form in patients with prostate cancer. The new assay is sufficiently sensitive to be used to study the diagnostic accuracies of free and total hK2 for prostate cancer.
Authors: Thomas Steuber; Andrew J Vickers; Alexander Haese; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Felix K-H Chun; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Melissa Assel; Liisa Sjöblom; Teemu J Murtola; Kirsi Talala; Paula Kujala; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Kimmo Taari; Anssi Auvinen; Andrew Vickers; Tapio Visakorpi; Teuvo L Tammela; Hans Lilja Journal: Eur Urol Focus Date: 2017-11-11
Authors: Robert J Klein; Christer Halldén; Angel M Cronin; Alexander Ploner; Fredrik Wiklund; Anders S Bjartell; Pär Stattin; Jianfeng Xu; Peter T Scardino; Kenneth Offit; Andrew J Vickers; Henrik Grönberg; Hans Lilja Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2010-04-27
Authors: Eric H Kim; Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Daniel D Sjoberg; Melissa Assel; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Daniel L J Thorek; Philip A Watson; Sang-Gyu Lee; Anson T Ku; Stylianos Bournazos; Katharina Braun; Kwanghee Kim; Kjell Sjöström; Michael G Doran; Urpo Lamminmäki; Elmer Santos; Darren Veach; Mesruh Turkekul; Emily Casey; Jason S Lewis; Diane S Abou; Marise R H van Voss; Peter T Scardino; Sven-Erik Strand; Mary L Alpaugh; Howard I Scher; Hans Lilja; Steven M Larson; David Ulmert Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Mari T Peltola; Pauliina Niemelä; Kalle Alanen; Martti Nurmi; Hans Lilja; Kim Pettersson Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: David Ulmert; Andrew J Vickers; Howard I Scher; Charlotte Becker; Peter Iversen; David Frankel; Jens-Kristian Jensen; Tine Kold Olesen; Hans Lilja Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: Sigrid V Carlsson; Mari T Peltola; Daniel Sjoberg; Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja; Monique J Roobol Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Daniel L J Thorek; Anson T Ku; Nicholas Mitsiades; Darren Veach; Philip A Watson; Dipti Metha; Sven-Erik Strand; Sai Kiran Sharma; Jason S Lewis; Diane S Abou; Hans G Lilja; Steven M Larson; Michael R McDevitt; David Ulmert Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 12.531