Literature DB >> 15246641

Safety and feasibility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecutive cases.

Andreas Wahl1, Ingo Paetsch, Albrecht Gollesch, Stefan Roethemeyer, Daniela Foell, Rolf Gebker, Holger Langreck, Christoph Klein, Eckart Fleck, Eike Nagel.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the safety of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (stress-CMR), which recently emerged as a highly accurate modality for diagnosis of inducible myocardial ischaemia. METHOD AND
RESULTS: From 1997 to 2002, 1000 consecutive stress-CMR examinations were performed. Images were acquired at rest and during a high-dose dobutamine-atropine protocol in 3 short-axis, a 4- and a 2-chamber view. Stress testing was discontinued when > or =85% of age-predicted heart rate was reached, on patient request, maximum pharmacologic infusion, or when new or worsening wall motion abnormalities, severe angina, dyspnoea, increase or decrease in blood pressure, or severe arrhythmias occurred. Stress-CMR was successfully performed in all but four patients (0.4%; insufficient ECG-triggering). Target heart rate was not reached in 95 cases (9.5%), due to maximum pharmacologic infusion in submaximal negative examinations in 21 cases (2.1%), and limiting side effects in 74 (7.4%). Side effects included one case (0.1%) of sustained and four cases (0.4%) of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, 16 cases (1.6%) of atrial fibrillation, and two cases (0.2%) of transient second degree AV block.
CONCLUSION: The safety profile of stress-CMR is similar to other methodologies using dobutamine infusions. Patients must be closely monitored, and resuscitation equipment and trained personnel must be available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15246641     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  34 in total

Review 1.  Established and emerging cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the assessment of stable coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  David P Ripley; Manish Motwani; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: structure, function, perfusion, and viability.

Authors:  David C Isbell; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  [Cardiovascular MRT--replacement of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography?].

Authors:  S Kelle; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Code blue in the MR suite--a drill to rescue a patients with cardiac arrest from the MR scanner.

Authors:  Olaf M Muehling; Armin Huber; Denise Friedrich; Michael Nabauer; Maximilian Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  MRI versus CT for the detection of coronary artery disease: current state and future promises.

Authors:  Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Small, short-duration, dobutamine-induced perfusion defects are not associated with adverse prognosis in intermediate-risk individuals receiving cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress imaging.

Authors:  Jennifer H Jordan; Jason C Haag; Timothy M Morgan; Sujethra Vasu; Brandon Stacey; Craig Hamilton; Killian Robinson; Dalane Kitzman; Vinay Thohan; William Gregory Hundley
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 9.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

10.  Coronary artery calcification score by multislice computed tomography predicts the outcome of dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Caroline H C Janssen; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Jelle Overbosch; Paul R M van Dijkman; Felix Zijlstra; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.