Literature DB >> 15246300

Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.

Stephen D Cook1, Samantha L Salkeld, Tom Stanley, Albert Faciane, Scot D Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Obtaining adequate purchase with standard pedicle screw techniques remains a challenge in poor quality bone. The development of alternate insertion techniques and screw designs was prompted by recognition of potential fixation complications. An expandable pedicle screw design has been shown to significantly improve fixation compared to a conventional screw in poor quality bone.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement augmentation of an expandable pedicle screw can further improve fixation strength compared to the expandable screw alone in severely osteoporotic bone. A technique for cement insertion into the pedicle by means of the cannulated central portion of the expandable screw is also described. STUDY
DESIGN: The axial pullout strength, stiffness and energy absorbed of cemented and noncemented expandable pedicle screws was determined in cadaveric vertebrae.
METHODS: Twenty-one fresh unembalmed vertebrae from the thoracolumbar spine were used. Radiographs and bone mineral density measurements (BMD) were used to characterize bone quality. Paired cemented and noncemented pedicle screw axial pullout strength was determined through mechanical testing. Mechanical pullout strength, stiffness and energy to failure was correlated with BMD.
RESULTS: Overall, there was a 250% increase in mean pullout strength with the cemented expandable screw compared with a noncemented expandable screw including a greater than twofold increase in pullout strength in the most severely osteoporotic bone. The mean stiffness and energy absorbed to failure was also significantly increased. A cemented conventional screw achieved a pullout strength similar to the noncemented expandable screw.
CONCLUSIONS: PMMA cement augmentation of the expandable pedicle screw may be a viable clinical option for achieving fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15246300     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  62 in total

1.  Morphological and structural characteristics of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Saeed AlSamak; Elias Bitsanis; Margarita Makou; George Eliades
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  [Pedicle screw augmentation from a biomechanical perspective].

Authors:  V Bullmann; U R Liljenqvist; R Rödl; T L Schulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Assessment of the morpho-densitometric parameters of the lumbar pedicles in osteoporotic and control women undergoing routine abdominal MDCT examinations.

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Giorgos Papadokostakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Cortical and Standard Trajectory Pedicle Screw Fixation Techniques in Stabilizing Multisegment Lumbar Spine with Low Grade Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Wayne K Cheng; Serkan İnceoğlu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-08-31

5.  [Balloon assisted cement application for stable fixation of pedicle screws in osteoporosis].

Authors:  D Briem; J P Petersen; P G Begemann; J M Rueger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques in Osteoporotic and Traumatic Fractures.

Authors:  Valérie Bousson; Bassam Hamze; Guillaume Odri; Thomas Funck-Brentano; Philippe Orcel; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Unilateral augmented pedicle screw fixation for foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Jeong-Gyun Kim; Yong-Jun Jin; Sang Ki Chung; Ki-Jeong Kim; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-07-31

8.  In-screw cement augmentation for iliosacral screw fixation in posterior ring pathologies with insufficient bone stock.

Authors:  M A König; S Hediger; J W Schmitt; T Jentzsch; K Sprengel; C M L Werner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Quantitative dual-energy CT for phantomless evaluation of cancellous bone mineral density of the vertebral pedicle: correlation with pedicle screw pull-out strength.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Christian Booz; Stefan Wesarg; Ralf W Bauer; J Matthias Kerl; Sebastian Fischer; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; M Fawad Khan; Konstantinos Kafchitsas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.