Literature DB >> 15245709

How common are side effects of spinal manipulation and can these side effects be predicted?

Barbara Cagnie1, Elke Vinck, Axel Beernaert, Dirk Cambier.   

Abstract

Little scientific support is available concerning usual and unusual reactions after spinal manipulation although such reactions are very common in clinical practice. Fifty-nine manipulative therapists were requested to enroll 15 consecutive patients attending for their first visit to receive spinal manipulation. These patients were asked to complete a questionnaire after this first visit that asked for possible risk factors for spinal manipulation and asked about any side effects after the manipulation. The participating practitioners were asked to note medical diagnosis, manipulated spinal region, number of treated areas and type of additional treatment. Four hundred and sixty five valuable responses were analysed. Two hundred and eighty three patients (60.9%) reported at least one post-manipulative reaction. The most common were headache (19.8%), stiffness (19.5%), local discomfort (15.2%), radiating discomfort (12.1%) and fatigue (12.1%). Most of these reactions began within 4 h and generally disappeared within the next 24 h. Women were more likely to report adverse effects than men (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that upper cervical manipulation (OR: 3.20; 95%CI: 1.89-7.77), use of medication (OR: 2.20; 95%CI: 1.31-3.69), gender (OR: 1.66; 95%CI: 1.01-2.75) and age (OR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.00-1.05) were independent predictors of headache after spinal manipulation. The results of this study indicate that reactions to spinal manipulation may be relatively common but are benign in nature and of short duration. Although it is difficult to label side effects as a risk, it is important to differentiate those patients who are susceptible to side effects in order to inform them correctly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15245709     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2004.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  49 in total

1.  Ultrasound analysis of the vertebral artery during non-thrust cervical translatoric spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Doug Creighton; Melodie Kondratek; John Krauss; Peter Huijbregts; Harvey Qu
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

2.  Safety of thrust joint manipulation in the thoracic spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emilio J Puentedura; William H O'Grady
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07

3.  The complexity of complementary medicine: chiropractic for back pain.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Determining adverse events in patients with neck pain receiving orthopaedic manual physiotherapy: a pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  Lisa C Carlesso; Joy C Macdermid; P Lina Santaguida; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Knowledge and pre-thoracic spinal thrust manipulation examination: a survey of current practice in the UK.

Authors:  Nicola R Heneghan; Sally E Davies; Emilio J Puentedura; Alison Rushton
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-09-05

6.  Safety of cervical spine manipulation: are adverse events preventable and are manipulations being performed appropriately? A review of 134 case reports.

Authors:  Emilio J Puentedura; Jessica March; Joe Anders; Amber Perez; Merrill R Landers; Harvey W Wallmann; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

7.  Beliefs and practice patterns in spinal manipulation and spinal motion palpation reported by canadian manipulative physiotherapists.

Authors:  Lisa C Carlesso; Joy C Macdermid; P Lina Santaguida; Lehana Thabane; Kevin Giulekas; Leo Larocque; James Millard; Caitlin Williams; Jack Miller; Bert M Chesworth
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Risk of traumatic injury associated with chiropractic spinal manipulation in Medicare Part B beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years.

Authors:  James M Whedon; Todd A Mackenzie; Reed B Phillips; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of mechanical traction for sub-groups of patients with low back pain: study methods and rationale.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Anne Thackeray; John D Childs; Gerard P Brennan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Chiropractic care for patients with acute neck pain: results of a pragmatic practice-based feasibility study.

Authors:  Michael T Haneline; Robert Cooperstein
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.