Literature DB >> 15244395

Evaluation and management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

David W Dodick1, Irene Meissner, Fredric B Meyer, Harry J Cloft.   

Abstract

Internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) is responsible for approximately 30% of ischemic strokes. Internal carotid artery stenosis of greater than 50% is present in about 4% to 8% of the population aged 50 to 79 years. Natural history studies and clinical trials have shown a small increase in stroke risk in patients with increasing degrees of ICAS, especially in those with greater than 80% reduction in carotid artery diameter. Randomized, prospective multicenter trials have revealed the superiority of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) over medical therapy in recently symptomatic patients with severe ICAS. However, the evidence from several randomized controlled trials of CEA in asymptomatic patients does not support the use of CEA in most of these patients; also, the role of noninvasive screening in this patient population remains uncertain and controversial. Furthermore, there is considerable uncertainty about whether the statistical benefit of avoiding a nondisabling stroke is worth the overall cost and risk of the procedure. Clinicians continue to struggle with treatment decisions for patients with asymptomatic ICAS. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic ICAS should be considered only for medically stable patients with 80% or greater stenosis who are expected to live at least 5 years, and only in centers with surgeons who have a demonstrated low (<3%) perioperative complication rate. We outline the prevalence and natural history of ICAS, the evidence for CEA in patients with asymptomatic ICAS, the roles of screening and monitoring for ICAS, the methods of evaluating ICAS, and the implications for practicing clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15244395     DOI: 10.4065/79.7.937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  6 in total

1.  Predictors of neurocognitive decline after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  J Mocco; David A Wilson; Ricardo J Komotar; Joseph Zurica; William J Mack; Hadi J Halazun; Raheleh Hatami; Robert R Sciacca; E Sander Connolly; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Should people with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergo endarterectomy for primary stroke prevention?

Authors:  David J Gladstone; Demetrios J Sahlas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Unknown internal carotid artery atherosclerotic stenoses detected with biphasic multidetector computed tomography for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Nicola Flor; Francesco Sardanelli; Simone Soldi; Giuseppe Franceschelli; Caterina Missiroli; Fiora De Paoli; Gianpaolo Cornalba
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Near/far matching: a study design approach to instrumental variables.

Authors:  Mike Baiocchi; Dylan S Small; Lin Yang; Daniel Polsky; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-09

5.  Signaling pathway of lysophosphatidic Acid-induced contraction in feline esophageal smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Yun Sung Nam; Jung Sook Suh; Hyun Ju Song; Uy Dong Sohn
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.016

6.  Upregulation of arylsulfatase B in carotid atherosclerosis is associated with symptoms of cerebral embolization.

Authors:  Erik Biros; Corey S Moran; Jane Maguire; Elizabeth Holliday; Christopher Levi; Jonathan Golledge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.