| Literature DB >> 15243887 |
M Takezawa1, Y Kida, M Kida, K Saigenji.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is assumed to have a theoretical advantage over endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in preserving sphincter of Oddi function because it does not involve cutting the biliary sphincter. Although attempts have been made to study the influence of EPBD and EST on sphincter of Oddi function, there is little agreement on this issue. In this study we used a method different from those described in previous reports to clarify whether EPBD or EST preserves sphincter of Oddi function better. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 200 patients with bile duct stones who met the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to EPBD (n = 104) or an EST (n = 96) group. Sphincter of Oddi function was estimated by measurement of the activity of pancreatic enzymes in the common bile duct (CBD). Pure bile was collected immediately before EPBD or EST, at 1 week and at 1 year after the procedure. We also statistically investigated 14 factors other than EPBD or EST that might have the potential to affect sphincter of Oddi function.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15243887 DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-814538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endoscopy ISSN: 0013-726X Impact factor: 10.093