Literature DB >> 15241720

Bone mineral density in Hispanic women: role of aerobic capacity, fat-free mass, and adiposity.

A Afghani1, A V Abbott, R A Wiswell, S V Jaque, C Gleckner, E T Schroeder, C A Johnson.   

Abstract

Understanding the etiology of factors influencing bone mineral density (BMD) in Hispanic women for the prevention of osteoporosis was the aim of this investigation. Whole body BMD (WBBMD) of 39 Hispanic, premenopausal women aged 22 - 51 years was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Maximal aerobic capacity ((.-)VO(2max)) was determined by treadmill ergometry with direct measurement of oxygen consumption. Fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass were estimated from two independent techniques, DXA and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). A questionnaire was administered to determine weekly physical activity, age of menarche, oral contraceptive (OC) use, parity, and lactation. Factors with significant correlation to WBBMD were weight ( r = 0.74), body mass index ( r = 0.66), fat mass ( r = 0.68 - 0.69), FFM ( r = 0.55 - 0.65), percent fat ( r = 0.43 - 0.55), sagittal diameter ( r = 0.58), waist circumference ( r = 0.53), hip circumference ( r = 0.66) and weekly activity ( r = 0.40). Stepwise multiple linear regression revealed that 73 % of the variance in WBBMD is attributed to fat mass (55 %), FFM (10 %), and (.-)VO(2max) (8 %). When BIA was used instead of DXA in the regression, (.-)VO(2max) was no longer an independent predictor of WBBMD. Fat mass and FFM accounted for 43 % and 20 % of the variance in WBBMD, respectively, explaining a total of 63 % of the variance. The addition of age, age of menarche, weekly physical activity, OC use, parity, and lactation did not make significant contributions to the variance. The findings of this study suggest that fat mass is a stronger predictor of bone mineral density than fat-free mass to BMD; aerobic capacity is another important predictor of BMD in Hispanic premenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15241720     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  6 in total

1.  Familial aggregation of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Yan Feng; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Henry Terwedow; Chang zhong Chen; Xin Xu; Tianhua Niu; Tonghua Zang; Di Wu; Genfu Tang; Zhiping Li; Xiumei Hong; Binyan Wang; Joseph D Brain; Steven R Cummings; Clifford Rosen; Mary L Bouxsein; Xiping Xu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Effect of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in premenopausal and perimenopausal women: a systematic review.

Authors:  S L Liu; C M Lebrun
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Percent body fat, fractures and risk of osteoporosis in women.

Authors:  G Wyshak
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Bone health in immigrant Hispanic women living in Texas.

Authors:  Joyce E Ballard; Cheryl M Cooper; Mary A Bone; Guillermo Saade; David B Holiday
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-10

5.  Resting energy expenditure: a stronger marker than body weight for bone mineral density in white women but not men? The Rancho Bernardo study.

Authors:  Afrooz Afghani; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.638

6.  Android shape independent of aerobic fitness: a risk factor for low bone mineral content in overweight and obese latina women.

Authors:  Afrooz Afghani
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Womens Health       Date:  2013-01-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.