Literature DB >> 15241654

Hemispheric differences in the recognition of partly occluded objects by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).

Lucia Regolin1, Fabio Marconato, Giorgio Vallortigara.   

Abstract

Domestic chicks are capable of perceiving as a whole objects partly concealed by occluders ("amodal completion"). In previous studies chicks were imprinted on a certain configuration and at test they were required to choose between two alternative versions of it. Using the same paradigm we now investigated the presence of hemispheric differences in amodal completion by testing newborn chicks with one eye temporarily patched. Separate groups of newly hatched chicks were imprinted binocularly: (1) on a square partly occluded by a superimposed bar, (2) on a whole or (3) on an amputated version of the square. At test, in monocular conditions, each chick was presented with a free choice between a complete and an amputated square. In the crucial condition 1, chicks tested with only their left eye in use chose the complete square (like binocular chicks would do); right-eyed chicks, in contrast, tended to choose the amputated square. Similar results were obtained in another group of chicks imprinted binocularly onto a cross (either occluded or amputated in its central part) and required to choose between a complete or an amputated cross. Left-eyed and binocular chicks chose the complete cross, whereas right-eyed chicks did not choose the amputated cross significantly more often. These findings suggest that neural structures fed by the left eye (mainly located in the right hemisphere) are, in the chick, more inclined to a "global" analysis of visual scenes, whereas those fed by the right eye seem to be more inclined to a "featural" analysis of visual scenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15241654     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0208-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  9 in total

1.  Development of object concepts in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Cynthia Hall-Haro; Scott P Johnson; Tracy A Price; Jayme A Vance; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.038

2.  Amodal completion of moving objects by pigeons.

Authors:  Yasuo Nagasaka; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

4.  "Prefrontal" Neuronal Foundations of Visual Asymmetries in Pigeons.

Authors:  Qian Xiao; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Lateralization of social cognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Jonathan Niall Daisley; Elena Mascalzoni; Orsola Rosa-Salva; Rosa Rugani; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Kea (Nestor notabilis) represent object trajectory and identity.

Authors:  Amalia P M Bastos; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of Baby Schema and Mere Exposure on Explicit and Implicit Face Processing.

Authors:  Leonardo Venturoso; Giulio Gabrieli; Anna Truzzi; Atiqah Azhari; Peipei Setoh; Marc H Bornstein; Gianluca Esposito
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-29

8.  Are animals autistic savants.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Allan Snyder; Gisela Kaplan; Patrick Bateson; Nicola S Clayton; Lesley J Rogers
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  Macphail's Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition.

Authors:  Amalia P M Bastos; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.