Literature DB >> 15241479

A double cryptic chromosome imbalance is an important factor to explain phenotypic variability in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome.

Marcella Zollino1, Rosetta Lecce, Angelo Selicorni, Marina Murdolo, Irene Mancuso, Giuseppe Marangi, Giuseppe Zampino, Livia Garavelli, Alessandra Ferrarini, Mariano Rocchi, John M Opitz, Giovanni Neri.   

Abstract

A total of five Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) patient with a 4p16.3 de novo microdeletion was referred because of genotype-phenotype inconsistencies, first explained as phenotypic variability of the WHS. The actual deletion size was found to be about 12 Mb in three patients, 5 Mb in another one and 20 Mb in the last one, leading us to hypothesize the presence of an extrachromosome segment on the deleted 4p. A der(4)(4qter --> p16.1::8p23 --> pter) chromosome, resulting from an unbalanced de novo translocation was, in fact, detected in four patients and a der(4)(4qter --> q32::4p15.3 --> qter) in the last. Unbalanced t(4;8) translocations were maternal in origin, the rec(4p;4q) was paternal. With the purpose of verifying frequency and specificity of this phenomenon, we investigated yet another group of 20 WHS patients with de novo large deletions (n = 13) or microdeletions (n = 7) and with apparently straightforward genotype-phenotype correlations. The rearrangement was paternal in origin, and occurred as a single anomaly in 19 out of 20 patients. In the remaining patient, the deleted chromosome 4 was maternally derived and consisted of a der(4)(4qter --> 4p16.3::8p23 --> 8pter). In conclusions, we observed that 20% (5/25) of de novo WHS-associated rearrangements were maternal in origin and 80% (20/25) were paternal. All the maternally derived rearrangements were de novo unbalanced t(4;8) translocations and showed specific clinical phenotypes. Paternally derived rearrangements were usually isolated deletions. It can be inferred that a double, cryptic chromosome imbalance is an important factor for phenotypic variability in WHS. It acts either by masking the actual deletion size or by doubling a quantitative change of the genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15241479     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  7 in total

1.  Clinical utility gene card for: Wolf-Hirschhorn (4p-) syndrome.

Authors:  Agatino Battaglia; Sarah South; John C Carey
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Fine-grained facial phenotype-genotype analysis in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome.

Authors:  Peter Hammond; Femke Hannes; Michael Suttie; Koen Devriendt; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Francesca Faravelli; Francesca Forzano; Susan Parekh; Steve Williams; Dominic McMullan; Sarah T South; John C Carey; Oliver Quarrell
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Familial Constitutional Rearrangement of Chromosomes 4 & 8: Phenotypically Normal Mother and Abnormal Progeny.

Authors:  Fulesh Kunwar; Sonal R Bakshi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

4.  Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome-associated chromosome changes are not mediated by olfactory receptor gene clusters nor by inversion polymorphism on 4p16.

Authors:  Marcella Zollino; Rosetta Lecce; Marina Murdolo; Daniela Orteschi; Giuseppe Marangi; Angelo Selicorni; Alina Midro; Giovanni Sorge; Giuseppe Zampino; Luigi Memo; Domenica Battaglia; Michael Petersen; Effie Pandelia; Yolanda Gyftodimou; Francesca Faravelli; Romano Tenconi; Livia Garavelli; Laura Mazzanti; Rita Fischetto; Pietro Cavalli; Salvatore Savasta; Laura Rodriguez; Giovanni Neri
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Phenotypic variations in wolf-hirschhorn syndrome.

Authors:  E Sukarova-Angelovska; M Kocova; V Sabolich; S Palcevska; N Angelkova
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 0.519

Review 6.  Mosaicism for structural non-centromeric autosomal rearrangements in disease-defined carriers: sex differences in the rearrangements profile and maternal age distributions.

Authors:  Natalia V Kovaleva; Philip D Cotter
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Diagnosis of familial Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome due to a paternal cryptic chromosomal rearrangement by conventional and molecular cytogenetic techniques.

Authors:  Carlos A Venegas-Vega; Fernando Fernández-Ramírez; Luis M Zepeda; Karem Nieto-Martínez; Laura Gómez-Laguna; Luz M Garduño-Zarazúa; Jaime Berumen; Susana Kofman; Alicia Cervantes
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.