Literature DB >> 15241314

Arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair.

Harald Boszotta1, Klaus Prünner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze the technique and value of arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair based on follow-up results after 3 years. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series.
METHODS: Since the beginning of 1997, 216 patients included in a clinical case series at the Department of Trauma Surgery of the Hospital of the Barmherzigen Brüder Eisenstadt have undergone arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair. Radiographic, clinical, and intraoperative parameters were carefully documented. All patients were treated with an arthroscopically assisted transosseous technique, in which bone tunnels are drilled with a target drill unit through the humeral head lateral to the biceps tendon from a third ventrocaudal incision on the humerus. The nonresorbable sutures placed into the cuff with a suture punch are passed transosseously and tied in the incision directly on the humeral head using a knot pusher. In December 2000, 84 patients (average age, 54.8 years; range, 28 to 74 years) underwent a clinical follow-up evaluation after a mean follow-up time of 35 months (28 to 44 months).
RESULTS: The average Constant score improved from a preoperative rating of 44.9 to a postoperative rating of 87.2. University of California, Los Angeles score was improved from 11.3 to 31.1 ( P <.001). Time of preoperative history, tear size, and condition of the long biceps tendon were found to have significant influence on results (P <.05). Thus, 20 patients with chronic, untreated tears of the long biceps tendon showed significantly worse results with a score of 81.8. Patients with curved or hooked acromion types (Bigliani II and III) showed significantly better results (P <.05) and patients with extensive tears had significantly worse results because of a residual strength deficit. The essential determinant was achievement of a stable tear closure with arthroscopic verification and documentation. Thus, 8 patients with a documented small gap between repaired cuff and bone showed a significantly worse rating in the Constant score, with 80.5 (P <.05). The complications encountered included development of seroma in one case and one case with frozen shoulder symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopically assisted repair of the rotator cuff was shown to be an effective procedure, guaranteeing good clinical results for medium- and large-sized tears with adequate mobility. Advantages include a primary stability comparable to that seen with open repair. Minimized trauma to soft tissue is associated with a lesser degree of postoperative pain and scarring and reduced hospitalization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15241314     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.04.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Clinical management of rotator cuff tears. Current concepts in cell-based therapy strategies].

Authors:  A Ficklscherer; M F Pietschmann; M Bendiks; B P Roßbach; P E Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Indications for surgery in clinical outcome studies of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Samuel K Chu; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Open transosseous reconstruction of the rotator cuff: clinical outcome, influencing factors and complications].

Authors:  D Maier; M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Herschel; P Ogon; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Functional recovery period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: is it predictable before surgery?

Authors:  Tomoya Manaka; Yoichi Ito; Isshin Matsumoto; Kunio Takaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Repetitive H-wave device stimulation and program induces significant increases in the range of motion of post operative rotator cuff reconstruction in a double-blinded randomized placebo controlled human study.

Authors:  Kenneth Blum; Amanda L C Chen; Thomas J H Chen; Roger L Waite; B William Downs; Eric R Braverman; Mallory M Kerner; Stella M Savarimuthu; Nicholas DiNubile
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Current biomechanical concepts for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-05-15

Review 7.  Sliding or Nonsliding Arthroscopic Knots for Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caellagh D Morrissey; Darby A Houck; Esther Jang; Eric C McCarty; Jonathan T Bravman; Adam J Seidl; Michelle L Wolcott; Armando F Vidal; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-04-24

8.  Impingement syndrome of the shoulder following double row suture anchor technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a case report.

Authors:  Rohit Rambani; Roger G Hackney
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-06-12

Review 9.  Tissue engineering for rotator cuff repair: an evidence-based systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mattia Loppini; Alessandra Berton; Filippo Spiezia; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  Quantitative Measurement of Muscle Atrophy and Fat Infiltration of the Supraspinatus Muscle Using Ultrasonography After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Yong Ki Kim; Eun Seok Choi; Keon Tae Kim; Jung Ro Yoon; Sang Han Chae
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.