Literature DB >> 15240450

Distributions in protein conformation space: implications for structure prediction and entropy.

David C Sullivan1, Irwin D Kuntz.   

Abstract

By considering how polymer structures are distributed in conformation space, we show that it is possible to quantify the difficulty of structural prediction and to provide a measure of progress for prediction calculations. The critical issue is the probability that a conformation is found within a specified distance of another conformer. We address this question by constructing a cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the average probability from observations about its limiting behavior at small displacements and numerical simulations of polyalanine chains. We can use the CDF to estimate the likelihood that a structure prediction is better than random chance. For example, the chance of randomly predicting the native backbone structure of a 150-amino-acid protein to low resolution, say within 6 A, is 10(-14). A high-resolution structural prediction, say to 2 A, is immensely more difficult (10(-57)). With additional assumptions, the CDF yields the conformational entropy of protein folding from native-state coordinate variance. Or, using values of the conformational entropy change on folding, we can estimate the native state's conformational span. For example, for a 150-mer protein, equilibrium alpha-carbon displacements in the native ensemble would be 0.3-0.5 A based on T Delta S of 1.42 kcal/(mol residue).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15240450      PMCID: PMC1304334          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.041723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  24 in total

1.  Exploring the dynamic information content of a protein NMR structure: comparison of a molecular dynamics simulation with the NMR and X-ray structures of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI.

Authors:  M Philippopoulos; C Lim
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-07-01

2.  Conformation spaces of proteins.

Authors:  D C Sullivan; I D Kuntz
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-03-01

Review 3.  Are denatured proteins ever random coils?

Authors:  R L Baldwin; B H Zimm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Unfolded, yes, but random? Never!

Authors:  K W Plaxco; M Gross
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-08

5.  Persistence of native-like topology in a denatured protein in 8 M urea.

Authors:  D Shortle; M S Ackerman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Probabilistic sampling of protein conformations: new hope for brute force?

Authors:  Howard J Feldman; Christopher W V Hogue
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-01-01

7.  Free-energy calculations highlight differences in accuracy between X-ray and NMR structures and add value to protein structure prediction.

Authors:  M R Lee; P A Kollman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Calculation of ensembles of structures representing the unfolded state of an SH3 domain.

Authors:  W Y Choy; J D Forman-Kay
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-05-18       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The backbone conformational entropy of protein folding: experimental measures from atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  James B Thompson; Helen G Hansma; Paul K Hansma; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1992-04-27       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  6 in total

1.  An information theoretic approach to macromolecular modeling: I. Sequence alignments.

Authors:  Tiba Aynechi; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  An information theoretic approach to macromolecular modeling: II. Force fields.

Authors:  Tiba Aynechi; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Determination of ensemble-average pairwise root mean-square deviation from experimental B-factors.

Authors:  Antonija Kuzmanic; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Thermodynamics of peptide and non-peptide interactions with the human 5HT1a receptor.

Authors:  Brian Hall; Andrea Burnett; Alicia Christians; Cortney Halley; Eric Goldstein; Harish V Thiagaraj; Keith K Parker
Journal:  Pharmacology       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Lan Hua; Michael J Schnieders; Vijay S Pande; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

6.  How does binding of agonist ligands control intrinsic molecular dynamics in human NMDA receptors?

Authors:  Zoltan Palmai; Kimberley Houenoussi; Sylvia Cohen-Kaminsky; Luba Tchertanov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.