Literature DB >> 15240050

Motivation and ability to walk for a food reward in fast- and slow-growing broilers to 12 weeks of age.

Eddie A M Bokkers1, Paul Koene.   

Abstract

Poor physical abilities of broilers may prevent them from performing behaviours for which they are motivated. The aim of this study was to measure the influence of physical ability and motivation on the performance of broilers in short physical tasks. We tested birds from a fast- and a slow-growing broiler strain in a runway to 12 weeks of age. To manipulate motivation, half of the birds of each strain was feed deprived for 3h and the other half for 24h before testing. Each bird was tested in a control and a slalom runway test once a week. With a similar motivation, slow growers had a shorter latency to start walking and walked faster through the runway than fast growers in both tests. In fast growers walking speed decreased faster with age than in slow growers. Slow growers vocalised more in both tests. In the slalom test, 24h deprived birds vocalised more than 3h deprived birds. Although the fast and slow growers have a different genetic background, the results indicated that motivation is the dominant determinative factor for walking in birds with a low body weight, while physical ability is the dominant determinative factor for walking in birds with a high body weight.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15240050     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  7 in total

1.  Environmental complexity positively impacts affective states of broiler chickens.

Authors:  M G Anderson; A M Campbell; A Crump; G Arnott; L Jacobs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Divergent selection on home pen locomotor activity in a chicken model: Selection program, genetic parameters and direct response on activity and body weight.

Authors:  Joergen B Kjaer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Slow and steady wins the race: The behaviour and welfare of commercial faster growing broiler breeds compared to a commercial slower growing breed.

Authors:  Laura M Dixon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  In pursuit of a better broiler: growth, efficiency, and mortality of 16 strains of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Stephanie Torrey; Mohsen Mohammadigheisar; Midian Nascimento Dos Santos; Daniel Rothschild; Lauren C Dawson; Zhenzhen Liu; Elijah G Kiarie; A Michelle Edwards; Ira Mandell; Niel Karrow; Dan Tulpan; Tina M Widowski
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Performance, Behavior, and Welfare Status of Six Different Organically Reared Poultry Genotypes.

Authors:  Alice Cartoni Mancinelli; Simona Mattioli; Alessandro Dal Bosco; Andrea Aliberti; Monica Guarino Amato; Cesare Castellini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Slow-growing broilers are healthier and express more behavioural indicators of positive welfare.

Authors:  Ann C Rayner; Ruth C Newberry; Judit Vas; Siobhan Mullan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens.

Authors:  Bahadır Can Güz; Ingrid C de Jong; Carol Souza Da Silva; Fleur Veldkamp; Bas Kemp; Roos Molenaar; Henry van den Brand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.