Literature DB >> 15239619

Resource use and treatment costs after kidney transplantation: impact of demographic factors, comorbidities, and complications.

Ernst-Günther Hagenmeyer1, Bertram Häussler, Elke Hempel, Gerrit Grannas, Zoltán Kaló, Anne Kilburg, Björn Nashan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to quantify outcomes, resource use, and treatment costs for the first 2 years after renal transplantation in a "real-life" European setting and to assess the impact of preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications on treatment costs.
METHODS: Inpatient and outpatient records of all patients who received a renal transplant at Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany, between January 1998 and July 2000, were evaluated. Key clinical events were recorded. Direct costs were calculated for primary hospitalization, the remainder of year 1, and year 2 after transplantation. Cost of organ procurement, pretransplant care, and transplant surgery were excluded. Cost consequences for key clinical events were determined.
RESULTS: Of 204 patients undergoing transplantation, 195 and 149 completed 1 year and 2 years of follow-up, respectively. The outcomes of years 1 and 2, respectively, were as follows: graft failure, 5.4%, 0.7%; acute rejection, 35.9%, 5.4%; cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, 29.2%, 2.0%; and delayed graft function, 30.9%. Costs for primary hospitalization, the remainder of year 1, and year 2 averaged Euro 15,380, Euro 18,636, and Euro 14,484, respectively. Cost-driving events included graft failure Euro 36,228), acute rejection (Euro 9,638), delayed graft function (Euro7,359), and CMV infection (Euro 4,149). Graft failure and acute rejection for year 1 also added significantly to the costs for year 2.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that posttransplant clinical outcomes result in a significant increase in treatment costs. Because the economic impact of primary causes of chronic rejection (acute rejection and CMV) and delayed graft function is substantial, careful selection of the most appropriate immunosuppressive regimen is essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15239619     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000121763.44137.fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  14 in total

1.  Association of hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index with resource utilization after allogeneic transplantation.

Authors:  L Decook; Y-H Chang; J Slack; D Gastineau; J Leis; P Noel; J Palmer; L Sproat; M Sorror; N Khera
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Donor Age, Cold Ischemia Time, and Delayed Graft Function.

Authors:  Ilkka Helanterä; Hassan N Ibrahim; Marko Lempinen; Patrik Finne
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Outcomes From Right Versus Left Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplants: A US National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sanjay Kulkarni; Guo Wei; Wei Jiang; Licia A Lopez; Chirag R Parikh; Isaac E Hall
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Factors predicting kidney delayed graft function among recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Islam M Korayem; Vatche G Agopian; Keri E Lunsford; Hans A Gritsch; Jeffrey L Veale; Gerald S Lipshutz; Hasan Yersiz; Coney L Serrone; Fady M Kaldas; Douglas G Farmer; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Gabriel M Danovitch; Ronald W Busuttil; Ali Zarrinpar
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Delayed Graft Function Phenotypes and 12-Month Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Authors:  Isaac E Hall; Peter P Reese; Mona D Doshi; Francis L Weng; Bernd Schröppel; William S Asch; Joseph Ficek; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Renal transplantation today.

Authors:  Michael Neipp; Steffan Jackobs; Jürgen Klempnauer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Cost-effectiveness of modern mTOR inhibitor based immunosuppression compared to the standard of care after renal transplantation in Germany.

Authors:  Jan Steffen Jürgensen; Robert Ikenberg; Roger-Axel Greiner; Volker Hösel
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-04-13

8.  The role of basiliximab in the evolving renal transplantation immunosuppression protocol.

Authors:  Paola Salis; Chiara Caccamo; Roberto Verzaro; Salvatore Gruttadauria; Mary Artero
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-06

9.  The Risk of Septicemia in End-Stage Renal Disease With and Without Renal Transplantation: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Te-Chun Shen; I-Kuan Wang; Chang-Ching Wei; Cheng-Li Lin; Chia-Ta Tsai; Te-Chun Hsia; Fung-Chang Sung; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Do kidney transplantations save money? A study using a before-after design and multiple register-based data from Sweden.

Authors:  Johan Jarl; Peter Desatnik; Ulrika Peetz Hansson; Karl Göran Prütz; Ulf-G Gerdtham
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2017-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.