Literature DB >> 15239238

Ultraflex stent--benefits and risks in ultimate palliation of advanced, malignant stenosis in the esophagus.

Florian Tomaselli1, Alfred Maier, Oliver Sankin, Hans Pinter, Josef Smolle, Freyja Maria Smolle-Jüttner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sophisticated endoscopical palliation in end-stage malignant stenosis of the esophagus and gastroesophageal-junction must be weighed against associated morbidity and mortality. In a prospective study we investigated benefits and risks of one type of coated, self-expandable stent in ultimate palliation of esophageal neoplasms focusing on factors that might predispose patients to develop complications.
METHODOLOGY: 33 men (70.2%) and 14 women (29.8%), (mean age 68.3 years, range from 38 to 90 years), suffering from nonresectable malignant stenosis of the esophagus due to advanced tumor stage and/or functional inoperability were treated by using a covered, self-expandable stent (covered ULTRAFLEX esophageal stent system, Microinvasive, Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston, MA). Stenting was indicated because of severe dysphagia for liquids and saliva in 41 (87.2%) patients, tracheoesophageal fistula in 5 (10.6%) patients and in one case of tumor bleeding (2.1%). 32 out of 47 patients had had one or other multiple treatment modalities before stenting. In 15 patients stenting was the first and only therapeutic option.
RESULTS: All patients experienced an improvement of dysphagia immediately after stenting. Eight out of 47 patients (17.1%) developed major stent-associated complications: Early complications within 4 days after implantation evolved in two cases, with one patient dying from stent-induced perforation with consecutive mediastinitis and multi-organ failure. Late complications (20 to 180 days after stent implantation) occurred in 6 cases: Three esophagotracheal fistulae (two with tracheal compression) induced by stent expansion, one stent-induced bleeding and two stent dislocations. After appropriate complication management all but two patients were able to be discharged after a mean of 2.6 days. Multivariate analysis did not show any factors that might have predicted the development of major stent-associated complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the self-expandable Ultraflex-stent will efficiently palliate dysphagia, bleeding and fistulae. The 17% risk of major complications seems acceptable regarding the inherent problems of alternative treatment options, like gastrostomy, PEG, nasogastric tube or long-term parenteral feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15239238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  5 in total

1.  Self-expanding Polyflex plastic stents in esophageal disease: various indications, complications, and outcomes.

Authors:  C Ott; N Ratiu; E Endlicher; H C Rath; C M Gelbmann; J Schölmerich; F Kullmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Management of esophageal stenting-associated esophagotracheal fistula, tracheal stenosis and tracheal rupture: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Fanceng Ji; Peihe Nie; Fuxia Yi; Limin Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Small caliber covered self-expanding metal stents in the management of malignant dysphagia.

Authors:  Stephen Kucera; James Barthel; Jason Klapman; Ravi Shridhar; Sarah Hoffe; Cynthia Harris; Khaldoun Almhanna; Kenneth Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

4.  Esophageal stenting in the setting of malignancy.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Martinez; Matthew M Puc; Roderick M Quiros
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-08

Review 5.  Thoracic complications and emergencies in oncologic patients.

Authors:  Leslie E Quint
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.