BACKGROUND: Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis may be acutely anticoagulated with direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). The anticoagulation is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or ecarin clotting time (ECT). OBJECTIVE: To compare 14 methods for measuring aPTT, as well as ECT and thrombin inhibitor management test (TIM), in samples containing DTIs. METHODS: DTIs were added to pooled normal plasma to achieve low (0.1-1.2 microg/mL) and high (1.5-8.0 microg/mL) drug concentrations. Each low-concentration DTI sample was tested using all aPTT reagents, while each low- and high-concentration DTI was tested using the ECT and TIM. RESULTS: All aPTT reagents had a significant dose-dependent correlation with drug concentration. Only Actin FSL and APTT-S demonstrated equivalent aPTT ratios obtained from any DTI. The TAS-aPTT was the most sensitive aPTT reagent to argatroban, with the aPTT ranging from 52.7 to 121.2 seconds corresponding to 0.1 to 1.2 microg/mL of drug concentration. The TAS-aPTT and Pathromtin were the most sensitive aPTT reagents to bivalirudin, with aPTTs of 87.4 seconds and 101.5 seconds, respectively, at 1.2 microg/mL of drug. Pathromtin was the most sensitive aPTT reagent to lepirudin, with a maximum aPTT of 108.9 seconds at 1.2 microg/mL of drug. There was no statistically significant difference between the TIM and ECT clotting times for each DTI. Lepirudin and bivalirudin ECT and TIM clotting times were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: There are unique differences between reagent manufacturers in the monitoring of DTIs. Acceptable alternatives to aPTT monitoring of DTI anticoagulation include the ECT and TIM.
BACKGROUND:Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis may be acutely anticoagulated with direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). The anticoagulation is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or ecarin clotting time (ECT). OBJECTIVE: To compare 14 methods for measuring aPTT, as well as ECT and thrombin inhibitor management test (TIM), in samples containing DTIs. METHODS: DTIs were added to pooled normal plasma to achieve low (0.1-1.2 microg/mL) and high (1.5-8.0 microg/mL) drug concentrations. Each low-concentration DTI sample was tested using all aPTT reagents, while each low- and high-concentration DTI was tested using the ECT and TIM. RESULTS: All aPTT reagents had a significant dose-dependent correlation with drug concentration. Only Actin FSL and APTT-S demonstrated equivalent aPTT ratios obtained from any DTI. The TAS-aPTT was the most sensitive aPTT reagent to argatroban, with the aPTT ranging from 52.7 to 121.2 seconds corresponding to 0.1 to 1.2 microg/mL of drug concentration. The TAS-aPTT and Pathromtin were the most sensitive aPTT reagents to bivalirudin, with aPTTs of 87.4 seconds and 101.5 seconds, respectively, at 1.2 microg/mL of drug. Pathromtin was the most sensitive aPTT reagent to lepirudin, with a maximum aPTT of 108.9 seconds at 1.2 microg/mL of drug. There was no statistically significant difference between the TIM and ECT clotting times for each DTI. Lepirudin and bivalirudin ECT and TIM clotting times were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: There are unique differences between reagent manufacturers in the monitoring of DTIs. Acceptable alternatives to aPTT monitoring of DTI anticoagulation include the ECT and TIM.
Authors: Mirjam Bachler; Lars M Asmis; Jürgen Koscielny; Thomas Lang; Hartmuth Nowak; Patrick Paulus; Jens-Christian Schewe; Christian von Heymann; Dietmar Fries Journal: Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 1.061