Literature DB >> 15238276

Survivorship patterns of larval amphibians exposed to low concentrations of atrazine.

Sara I Storrs1, Joseph M Kiesecker.   

Abstract

Amphibians can be exposed to contaminants in nature by many routes, but perhaps the most likely route is agricultural runoff in amphibian breeding sites. This runoff results in high-level pulses of pesticides. For example, atrazine, the most widely used pesticide in the United States, can be present at several parts per million in agricultural runoff. However, pesticide levels are likely to remain in the environment at low levels for longer periods. Nevertheless, most studies designed to examine the impacts of contaminants are limited to short-term (approximately 4 days) tests conducted at relatively high concentrations. To investigate longer-term (approximately 30 days) exposure of amphibians to low pesticide levels, we exposed tadpoles of four species of frogs--spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer), American toads (Bufo americanus, green frogs (Rana clamitans), and wood frogs (Rana sylvatica)--at early and late developmental stages to low concentrations of a commercial preparation of atrazine (3, 30, or 100 ppb; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency drinking water standard is 3 ppb). We found counterintuitive patterns in rate of survivorship. Survival was significantly lower for all animals exposed to 3 ppb compared with either 30 or 100 ppb, except the late stages of B. americanus and R. sylvatica. These survival patterns highlight the importance of investigating the impacts of contaminants with realistic exposures and at various developmental stages. This may be particularly important for compounds that produce greater mortality at lower doses than higher doses, a pattern characteristic of many endocrine disruptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15238276      PMCID: PMC1247376          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


Although pesticides are used on a local scale, they are ubiquitous and spread regionally and globally. In some areas, the transport and deposition of pesticides from agriculturally intensive areas to adjacent nonagricultural areas are well documented (Davidson et al. 2002; LeNoir et al. 1999; Zabik and Seiber 1993). Moreover, pesticides have been found in the bodies of frogs from areas where pesticide use has not occurred historically or in the past 25 years (Cory et al. 1970; Datta et al. 1998; Russell et al. 1995, 1997). Agricultural runoff of pesticides can also have an effect on amphibians because pesticides have been detected at amphibian sites almost a year after being applied (Hayes et al. 2003). This measure of persistence combined with their high susceptibility to exposure, because they have a complex life cycle and permeable skin (Cooke 1981; Hall and Henry 1992), demonstrates that amphibians are excellent model organisms for testing pesticide exposure. Runoff from agricultural lands can expose pond-breeding amphibians to various levels of pesticides. For example, atrazine, the most widely used pesticide in the United States [U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2002], has been reported at levels from 0.1 to 6.7 ppb in amphibian breeding ponds in mid- to late July (Hayes et al. 2003), but during storm events agricultural runoff has been reported to be as high as 480 ppb (Huber 1993). Moreover, it has been measured in rainfall at levels up to 40 ppb in agricultural areas (Nations and Hallberg 1992). Atrazine can be present at several parts per million in agricultural runoff for short periods of time (days). However, atrazine levels are likely to remain relatively low (parts per billion) for longer periods of time (Huber 1993). Nevertheless, most studies designed to examine the impacts of contaminants are limited to short-term (~ 4 days) tests conducted with relatively high concentrations (parts per million). Studies that have examined larval amphibian exposure to atrazine have found effects on plasma thyroxine, plasma corticosterone, larval size (Larson et al. 1998), developmental stage (Howe et al. 1998; Larson et al. 1998), body condition (Allran and Karasov 2000; Howe et al. 1998), hermaphrodism and demasculinized larynges (Hayes et al. 2002), and increased susceptibility to infection (Kiesecker 2002). Atrazine has been suggested to exhibit endocrine-disrupting effects via inhibition of androgen receptors in mammals (Danzo 1997) and by inducing aromatase, the enzyme that converts androgen to estrogen, in mammals (Sanderson et al. 2000, 2001), amphibians (Hayes et al. 2002, 2003), and potentially reptiles (Crain et al. 1997). Studies have linked endocrine disruptors to changes in both humans and wildlife (Bigsby et al. 1999; Colborn and Thayer 2000; Colborn et al. 1993; Taylor and Harrison 1999). However, it is the careful examination of wildlife studies that has brought widespread awareness of endocrine disruption to the forefront. These chemicals display several unique characteristics contrary to traditional toxicologic thinking. For example, many endocrine disruptors do not have a definable toxicologic threshold level below which effects are negligible or nonexistent (Welshons et al. 2003). We now know that endocrine disruptors commonly exhibit a nonmonotonic dose–response curve (NMDRC) in which the response reverses as concentration increases in a U-shaped or inverted U-shaped curve. A classic NMDRC was illustrated for the estrogen mimic diethylstilbestrol in a study of prostate weight in mice (vom Saal et al. 1997) and continues to be evident in both vertebrate (Cavieres et al. 2002; Gupta 2000) and invertebrate (Oehlmann et al. 2000) responses to endocrine disruptors. Because endocrine disruptors often display effects at low levels, it is important to examine low, ecologically relevant concentrations of contaminants. Further, these effects can vary considerably depending on the period of the life cycle during which an organism is exposed (Bigsby et al. 1999). To investigate long-term exposure of amphibians to low pesticide concentrations, we exposed four local species of frogs, spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer), American toads (Bufo americanus), green frogs (Rana clamitans), and wood frogs (Rana sylvatica), at early (Gosner stages 25–27; Gosner 1960) and late (stages 29–36) developmental stages to low concentrations of atrazine (3, 30, or 100 ppb).

Materials and Methods

Animal collection.

Spring peepers (P. crucifer) and wood frogs (R. sylvatica) were collected from State Game Lands #176 (Centre County, PA) as either embryos or larvae. American toads (B. americanus) were collected as larvae from a wading pool where eggs were voluntarily laid. Green frogs (R. climitans) were collected as embryos from Colyer Lake (Centre County, PA). Collection date and stage as well as larval period for each species are summarized in Table 1. Wood frogs to be used as late-stage animals were held in cattle watering tanks outdoors, whereas American toads and green frogs to be used as late-stage animals were held in glass aquaria in the laboratory. All other animals were collected from the field and placed immediately into the experiment.
Table 1

Animals collected.

Date(s)StageLarval periodReference
P. crucifer30 March–2 MayEmbryo45 daysGosner and Rossman 1960
R. sylvatica24 March–6 AprilEmbryo67 daysStebbins 1951
B. americanus17 JulyHatchling39 daysWilbur 1977
R. clamitans31 JulyEmbryo92 days to 1 yearRichmond 1964

Date(s) of collection do not indicate the only time embryos are available; the breeding period for each species varies depending on temperature and rainfall across the home range of each species.

Dosing.

We exposed animals to 0, 3, 30, or 100 ppb of commercial-grade atrazine [Aatrex Nine-O, 85.5% atrazine (Syngenta, Greensboro, NC); generally applied during April and May]. The lowest concentration (3 ppb) was based on the drinking water standard for atrazine set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA 2002). This concentration was chosen to reflect a conservative exposure level for larval amphibians. To achieve the concentrations, we dissolved commercial-grade atrazine (water-soluble granules) in tap water to create a stock solution of 30 mg/L as needed. The stock solution was diluted in dechlorinated tap water to make approximate treatment concentrations. All water used for treatments in the experiment was allowed to reach room temperature before being mixed with atrazine stock solution. Every 3 days, treatment water in the tadpole containers and food was replaced (Hayes et al. 2002). Every 3 days, survival and/or date of metamorphosis (Gosner stage 42; Gosner 1960) was recorded for all individuals. Dead animals were removed from the experiment and preserved in 70% ethanol. Two samples of water from each concentration of atrazine were collected within 1 hr of being mixed and taken to an outside laboratory (Exygen, Inc., State College, PA) to be tested for concentration accuracy. On average, low, medium, and high concentrations were 2.84 ± 0.05 ppb, 25.20 ± 1.82 ppb, and 64.80 ± 2.88 ppb (mean ± SD), respectively.

Exposures.

Exposures lasted for approximately 30 days. Experiments for each species were performed separately when animals became available. Tadpoles were haphazardly assigned to individual experimental units in a randomized block design containing one of four treatments of atrazine (0, 3, 30, and 100 ppb). Smaller animals (spring peepers, American toads, and early-stage green frogs) were kept in 120 mL polypropylene cups in 100 mL dechlorinated water (with appropriate treatment), whereas larger animals (late wood frogs and late green frogs) were kept in 750 mL high-density polyethylene cups in 500 mL dechlorinated water. Exposures began at either early larval stages (Gosner stages ~ 25–27; Gosner 1960) or late larval stages (stages ~ 29–36) under controlled laboratory conditions. We examined a subsample of animals to determine the developmental stage at which exposure began. At the time of experimentation, early-stage wood frogs were not available. Animals that metamorphosed during the experiment were eliminated from the data set; therefore, sample size for each treatment for late-stage animals varied. Although averaged for all species, the control had the highest proportion of metamorphs (41.7%) compared with low (26.0%), medium (20.4%), and high (26.5%) treatments. Sample size for each treatment was as follows: early spring peepers [control (C) = 111, low (L) = 112, medium (M) = 101, high (H) = 106], late spring peepers (C = 14, L = 20, M = 21, H = 19), early American toads (C = 30, L = 27, M = 30, H = 30), late American toads (C = 6, L = 7, M = 7, H = 7), early green frogs (C = 15, L = 15, M = 15, H = 15), late green frogs (C = 15, L = 15, M = 15, H = 15), late wood frogs (C = 8, L = 10, M = 10, H = 10). Experiments ran from 30 March 2002 to 7 November 2002 under controlled laboratory conditions of a 12-hr light/dark cycle and a temperature of 22°C. All animals were fed crushed alfalfa every 3 days when the water was changed. The use of animals in this study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Pennsylvania State University (IACUC #02R011-00)

Statistical analysis.

Survivorship is a function of the days until death and overall mortality at the end of the experiment. These variables were incorporated into a nonparametric survival analysis using Minitab statistical software (Release 13.1; Minitab Inc., State College, PA) to obtain Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities. In turn, these probabilities were used to create survivorship curves (Figure 1). The survivorship curves represent the days until death for animals that died during the experiment; they also take into account the number of animals that lived past the experimental period. A log-rank test value was used to evaluate statistical significance at α = 0.05. Because tests were done separately and under different conditions (e.g., varying water volume) for each species, statistical comparisons could not be made between species or stages of the same species.
Figure 1

Survivorship curves for early and late-stage animals; all experiments ran at least 30 days. (A) Early spring peepers (p < 0.001, p-value for overall significance). (B) Late spring peepers (p = 0.002). (C) Early American toads (p < 0.001). (D) Late American toads (p = 0.003). (E) Early green frogs (p < 0.001). (F) Late green frogs (p < 0.001). (G) Late wood frogs (p = 0.069). Early wood frogs were not available for experimentation.

Results

Generally, survival was lowest at the low concentrations of atrazine and highest at the high concentrations. This survivorship pattern was seen for early American toads and for both early and late stages of spring peepers and green frogs (Figure 1).

Early spring peepers.

Although survivorship at low and medium atrazine concentrations was not significantly different (p = 0.597) for early spring peepers (Figure 1A), survivorship increased significantly (p < 0.001) with each increasing concentration.

Late spring peepers.

Late spring peepers (Figure 1B) showed significantly reduced survivorship (p < 0.01) for low exposure compared with all other atrazine concentrations. However, neither medium (p = 0.252) nor high (p = 0.392) exposures were significantly different from the control.

Early American toads.

For early American toads (Figure 1C), survivorship at medium and high atrazine concentrations was not significantly different (p = 0.207). Survivorship increased significantly (p < 0.001) with each increasing concentration of atrazine.

Late American toads.

The survivorship pattern for late American toads (Figure 1D) revealed that each individual concentration of atrazine was significantly different from the control (p < 0.01); however, none of the survivorship curves for the individual levels of atrazine was significantly different compared with the others (low and medium, p = 0.203; low and high, p = 0.792; medium and high, p = 0.240).

Early green frogs.

For early green frogs (Figure 1E) there was a significantly reduced survivorship period for the low atrazine concentration compared with all other treatments (low and control, p = 0.021; low and medium, p = 0.013; low and high, p = 0.003).

Late green frogs.

Late green frogs (Figure 1F) exposed to low atrazine concentrations had a significantly reduced survivorship compared with all other treatments (low and control, p < 0.001; low and medium, p < 0.001; low and high, p = 0.005).

Late wood frogs.

For late wood frogs (Figure 1G) there was a significant difference only between the survivorship of low and medium atrazine concentrations (p = 0.027). The difference between control and low treatments approached significance (p = 0.07). All other comparisons were not significantly different (p > 0.05).

Discussion

Our results suggest that in some situations contaminants can have a greater impact at lower concentrations that at higher concentrations. In these laboratory experiments, animals exposed to the low concentration of atrazine died sooner (Figure 1) than did animals exposed to the medium or high concentrations. This pattern is evident in all species except late American toads; the difference in pattern seen here may be attributed to the small sample size of that test. The nature of the pattern is similar to the NMDRC commonly seen in studies examining the effects of endocrine disruptors (Cavieres et al. 2002; Gupta 2000; vom Saal et al. 1997). Traditional toxicology studies use LC50 values (lethal concentrations whereby 50% of the population dies) and linearly extrapolate a predicted response from the LC50 high concentration to low concentrations (Welshons et al. 2003). In our study, mortality was high at the low concentration and low at the high concentration, which is indicative of a U-shaped curve (Figure 2). For example, Birge et al. (1980) reported an LC50 of 48 ppm for atrazine in the American toad 4-days posthatching. When we converted our survival results to 4-day data and combined them with the data from Birge et al. (1980), the pattern in the present case fit the NMDRC pattern as illustrated by a U-shaped curve. The overall pattern (Figure 2) emerging from such low levels suggests that great care should be taken when attempting to elucidate the effects of endocrine disruptors on amphibians at various points in their life cycle. Our results also demonstrate the importance of testing at levels below traditional toxicologic methodologies.
Figure 2

Heuristic model of the NMDRC for atrazine. Data are plotted as the average mortality of all species exposed to ecologically relevant concentrations of atrazine regardless of developmental stage.

In our study, both early-stage (Gosner stages 25–27) and late-stage (Gosner stages 29–36) animals were exposed to reveal possible differences in amphibian response at different points in the life cycle. Pesticide exposure at different life stages can yield significantly different survival rates (Harris et al. 2000). Moreover, exposure to endocrine disruptors during critical times of development can lead to irreversible changes (Bigsby et al. 1999). In our study, it appeared that early and late American toads responded differently to atrazine exposures in terms of survival (Figure 1C, D). The Rana species (green frogs and wood frogs) seem to be more robust in that they experienced higher survivorship (Figure 1E–G) than the other families represented (Hylidae and Bufonidae; Figure 1A–D). Unlike survivorship patterns of the other species, which consistently dropped below 15.00%, the probability of survival for Rana species never dropped below 33.33% (Figure 1F). Others have studied the effects of atrazine on larval amphibians using atrazine levels ranging from 0.01 to 47,600 ppb (Allran and Karasov 2000; Detenbeck et al. 1996; Hayes et al. 2002; Howe et al. 1998; Larson et al. 1998), but none have reported the survivorship patterns observed in our study. Hayes et al. (2002) exposed Xenopus laevis to concentrations lower than those in the present study and reported hermaphrodism and decreased larynx size, yet no mortality was found. Species, grade of atrazine, concentration of atrazine, or experimental setup may have caused the dissimilarities between the present study and others. For example, in the present study, we used a commercial preparation of atrazine (Aatrex Nine-O) containing 85.5% atrazine to create the atrazine concentrations. The remaining 14.5% of this field-grade atrazine contains other chemicals (e.g., surfactants) that may have an impact on survivorship patterns of larval amphibians. Also, in other experiments different grades of atrazine were used; for example, Howe et al. (1998) used atrazine 4L containing 40.8% atrazine. Although atrazine was originally created for plant use, it has been linked to several hormonal impacts in animals. The discovery of hermaphrodism in X. laevis exposed to atrazine in the laboratory (Hayes et al. 2002) has been extended to R. pipiens exposed in a field setting (Hayes et al. 2003). Atrazine has also been linked to reproductive abnormalities in both the testis and ovary of X. laevis (Tavera-Mendoza et al. 2002a, 2002b), decreased reproductive success of R. temporaria (Hazelwood 1970), and decreased reproductive output in bluegill sunfish, L. macrochirus, (Kettle et al. 1987). Several mammalian studies have shown links between atrazine and reproductive abnormalities including decrease in testosterone production (Friedmann 2002) and altered onset of puberty (Laws et al. 2000). Atrazine may affect mammals (Sanderson et al. 2000, 2001), amphibians (Hayes et al. 2002), and potentially reptiles (Crain et al. 1997) by altering aromatase, the enzyme responsible for converting an androgen to an estrogen. Although someone may interpret our results such that high levels of atrazine contamination are actually beneficial (Figure 2), it is very likely that such high levels of any chemical would have other, unmeasured, negative direct effects or indirect effects on species interactions (Relyea and Mills 2001), disease susceptibility (Kiesecker 2002), or the community in general (Mills 2002). Individual applications of pesticides affect amphibian environments locally—mode of application, persistence, and modes of action all differ; however, the use of pesticides in general is worldwide. Given the pattern of significantly reduced survival at low concentrations, the results of our study suggest that low-level testing is imperative when considering contaminant exposure of amphibians. Not only are these results contrary to traditional thinking but they also occur at ecologically relevant levels (Hayes et al. 2003; Huber 1993). Atrazine is generally applied between April and May and corresponds well with the larval period of the species tested (Table 1). Moreover, the exposures lasted for at least 30 days, highlighting the importance of longer term exposure experiments. For example, the survival patterns for the early green frogs and late wood frogs only became apparent after being exposed for 24 days. As populations of amphibians and other wildlife decline, it is critical to examine all possible mechanisms for their decrease (Blaustein and Kiesecker 2002).
  25 in total

1.  Pesticides and PCB contaminants in fish and tadpoles from the Kaweah River basin, California.

Authors:  S Datta; L Hansen; L McConnell; J Baker; J LeNoir; J N Seiber
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Diet and reproductive success of bluegill recovered from experimental ponds treated with atrazine.

Authors:  W D Kettle; F deNoyelles; B D Heacock; A M Kadoum
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Distribution patterns of DDT residues in the Sierra Nevada Mountains.

Authors:  L Cory; P Fjeld; W Serat
Journal:  Pestic Monit J       Date:  1970-03

4.  Prostate enlargement in mice due to fetal exposure to low doses of estradiol or diethylstilbestrol and opposite effects at high doses.

Authors:  F S vom Saal; B G Timms; M M Montano; P Palanza; K A Thayer; S C Nagel; M D Dhar; V K Ganjam; S Parmigiani; W V Welshons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of the herbicide atrazine on Ambystoma tigrinum metamorphosis: duration, larval growth, and hormonal response.

Authors:  D L Larson; S McDonald; A J Fivizzani; W E Newton; S J Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Zool       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec

6.  Atrazine-induced hermaphroditism at 0.1 ppb in American leopard frogs (Rana pipiens): laboratory and field evidence.

Authors:  Tyrone Hayes; Kelly Haston; Mable Tsui; Anhthu Hoang; Cathryn Haeffele; Aaron Vonk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Environmental xenobiotics may disrupt normal endocrine function by interfering with the binding of physiological ligands to steroid receptors and binding proteins.

Authors:  B J Danzo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Alterations in steroidogenesis in alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) exposed naturally and experimentally to environmental contaminants.

Authors:  D A Crain; L J Guillette; A A Rooney; D B Pickford
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans.

Authors:  T Colborn; F S vom Saal; A M Soto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Developmental toxicity of a commercial herbicide mixture in mice: I. Effects on embryo implantation and litter size.

Authors:  María Fernanda Cavieres; James Jaeger; Warren Porter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Effects of fluoranthene on the fitness-related traits and antioxidative defense in Lymantria dispar L.

Authors:  Marija Mrdaković; Larisa Ilijin; Milena Vlahović; Dajana Todorović; Anja Gavrilović; Aleksandra Mrkonja; Vesna Perić-Mataruga
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Do host-associated gut microbiota mediate the effect of an herbicide on disease risk in frogs?

Authors:  Sarah A Knutie; Caitlin R Gabor; Kevin D Kohl; Jason R Rohr
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Parasites, info-disruption, and the ecology of fear.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Autumn Swan; Thomas R Raffel; Peter J Hudson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Low levels of the herbicide atrazine alter sex ratios and reduce metamorphic success in Rana pipiens tadpoles raised in outdoor mesocosms.

Authors:  Valérie S Langlois; Amanda C Carew; Bruce D Pauli; Michael G Wade; Gerard M Cooke; Vance L Trudeau
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Combined effects of atrazine and chlorpyrifos on susceptibility of the tiger salamander to Ambystoma tigrinum virus.

Authors:  Jacob L Kerby; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.184

7.  Atrazine exposure affects longevity, development time and body size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sarah R Marcus; Anthony C Fiumera
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.354

8.  Burrowing in the freshwater mussel Elliptio complanata is sexually dimorphic and feminized by low levels of atrazine.

Authors:  Katherine Flynn; Maria Belopolsky Wedin; Josephine A Bonventre; Marsha Dillon-White; Jessica Hines; Benjamin S Weeks; Chantale André; Martin P Schreibman; Francois Gagné
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2013

9.  The fungicide chlorothalonil is nonlinearly associated with corticosterone levels, immunity, and mortality in amphibians.

Authors:  Taegan A McMahon; Neal T Halstead; Steve Johnson; Thomas R Raffel; John M Romansic; Patrick W Crumrine; Raoul K Boughton; Lynn B Martin; Jason R Rohr
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A qualitative meta-analysis reveals consistent effects of atrazine on freshwater fish and amphibians.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Krista A McCoy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.