Literature DB >> 15237696

Evaluation of myocardial performance index to predict mild rejection in cardiac transplantation.

Savvas T Toumanidis1, Electra S Papadopoulou, Nikolaos S Saridakis, Anna T Kalantaridou, Emmanuel V Agapitos, John N Nanas, Stamatios F Stamatelopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of heart transplant rejection is mandatory, since even mild rejection can rapidly progress to more severe rejection. Noninvasive diagnosis of heart transplant rejection still remains a challenge. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to determine a possible association between myocardial performance index (MPI) and biopsy score of the heart transplant.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 99 complete Doppler echocardiographic studies from 24 consecutive patients (23 men) performed within 24 h of endomyocardial biopsy. Mean age of the cohort was 50 +/- 9 years and mean time from transplantation was 19 +/- 21 months (1-81). All patients were in sinus rhythm. Myocardial performance index was calculated as the ratio of isovolumic contraction time plus isovolumic relaxation time divided by ejection time. Left ventricular dimensions, left ventricular mass, ejection fraction, and a number of Doppler indices (E-point velocity, A-point velocity, deceleration time, and deceleration slope) were also measured. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grading system was used for the classification of endomyocardial biopsies.
RESULTS: Myocardial performance index was significantly prolonged (0.60 +/- 0.13, 0.68 +/- 0.08, 0.75 +/- 0.20, in biopsy scores 0, IA, and IB, respectively; p<0.001). Isovolumic contraction time was significantly prolonged; isovolumic relaxation time was not significantly changed. Ejection time and deceleration time were significantly shortened. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis revealed that MPI and deceleration time were the only independent predictors of biopsy score (r=0.48, F=10.53, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Myocardial performance index seems to be a useful adjunct in the follow-up of cardiac transplant patients. These preliminary data suggest that a larger study may be indicated to clarify the relevance of myocardial performance index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15237696      PMCID: PMC6654749          DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960270611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  31 in total

1.  Effect of preload alternations on a new Doppler echocardiographic index of combined systolic and diastolic performance.

Authors:  J E Møller; S H Poulsen; K Egstrup
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  The influence of heart rate on the Doppler-derived myocardial performance index.

Authors:  S H Poulsen; J C Nielsen; H R Andersen
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  The Tei index - a role in the diagnosis of heart failure?

Authors:  M St John Sutton; S E Wiegers
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Evaluation of a noninvasive index of global ventricular function to predict rejection after pediatric cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  S J Mooradian; C S Goldberg; D C Crowley; A Ludomirsky
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Value of the Doppler index of myocardial performance in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S H Poulsen; S E Jensen; C Tei; J B Seward; K Egstrup
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Usefulness of the combined index of systolic and diastolic myocardial performance to identify cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthy Vivekananthan; Thomachan Kalapura; Mandeep Mehra; Carl Lavie; Richard Milani; Robert Scott; Myung Park
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Tei-index in patients with mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure.

Authors:  C Bruch; A Schmermund; D Marin; M Katz; T Bartel; J Schaar; R Erbel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Usefulness of the myocardial performance index for assessing right ventricular function in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  B W Eidem; P W O'Leary; C Tei; J B Seward
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Serial changes and prognostic implications of a Doppler-derived index of combined left ventricular systolic and diastolic myocardial performance in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S H Poulsen; S E Jensen; J C Nielsen; J E Møller; K Egstrup
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Clinical significance of mild rejection of the cardiac allograft.

Authors:  T K Yeoh; W H Frist; T E Eastburn; J Atkinson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Myocardial performance index suggests optimal fluid loss during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Elektra S Papadopoulou; Savvas T Toumanidis; George Tsirpanlis; Chrisanthi O Trika; Garyfalia Kalatzopoulou; Spyridon D Moulopoulos
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Jun Zheng; Xudong Pan; Lizhong Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.