U Wedegärtner1, M Lorenzen, H D Nagel, C Weber, G Adam. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf. wedegaer@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the radiation dose of whole-body multislice CT (MSCT) and conventional radiography with organ-specific CT in polytrauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The whole-body MSCT encompassing brain, neck and midface, chest, abdomen and pelvis was performed on a Somatom Volume Zoom (Siemens). Conventional radiography consisted of chest and cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine in two views as well as pelvis (Polymat, Siemens). Three combinations of organ specific CT were chosen: CT examination of (1) head and cervical spine, (2) head, cervical spine and chest, (3) head, cervical spine and abdomen. The effective doses of whole-body MSCT and conventional radiography with organ-specific CT were calculated. RESULTS: Effective doses were 20 mSv for whole-body MSCT, 2 mSv for conventional x-ray, and 5 mSv for combination (1), 8 mSv for combination (2) and (3) 16 mSv for combination (3) of the organ-specific CT. The ratio of radiation dose between whole-body MSCT and radiography was 10 : 1. This ratio was reduced to 3 : 1, 2 : 1 and 1 : 1 when a combination of radiography and CT was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body MSCT in polytrauma compared to conventional radiography with organ-specific CT induces a threefold increased dose in unfavorable situations and no increased dose in favorable situations. Nevertheless, routine use of whole-body MSCT should be critically evaluated and should be adapted to the clinical benefit.
PURPOSE: To compare the radiation dose of whole-body multislice CT (MSCT) and conventional radiography with organ-specific CT in polytrauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The whole-body MSCT encompassing brain, neck and midface, chest, abdomen and pelvis was performed on a Somatom Volume Zoom (Siemens). Conventional radiography consisted of chest and cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine in two views as well as pelvis (Polymat, Siemens). Three combinations of organ specific CT were chosen: CT examination of (1) head and cervical spine, (2) head, cervical spine and chest, (3) head, cervical spine and abdomen. The effective doses of whole-body MSCT and conventional radiography with organ-specific CT were calculated. RESULTS: Effective doses were 20 mSv for whole-body MSCT, 2 mSv for conventional x-ray, and 5 mSv for combination (1), 8 mSv for combination (2) and (3) 16 mSv for combination (3) of the organ-specific CT. The ratio of radiation dose between whole-body MSCT and radiography was 10 : 1. This ratio was reduced to 3 : 1, 2 : 1 and 1 : 1 when a combination of radiography and CT was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body MSCT in polytrauma compared to conventional radiography with organ-specific CT induces a threefold increased dose in unfavorable situations and no increased dose in favorable situations. Nevertheless, routine use of whole-body MSCT should be critically evaluated and should be adapted to the clinical benefit.
Authors: Robin D Munk; Peter C Strohm; Ulrich Saueressig; Joern Zwingmann; Markus Uhl; Norbert P Südkamp; Elmar Kotter; Mathias Langer; Thorsten A Bley Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2009-01-16
Authors: Karl-Georg Kanz; April O Paul; Rolf Lefering; Mike V Kay; Uwe Kreimeier; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Wolf Mutschler; Stefan Huber-Wagner Journal: J Trauma Manag Outcomes Date: 2010-05-10
Authors: Christos Loupatatzis; Sebastian Schindera; Jan Gralla; Hanno Hoppe; Jan Bittner; Ralph Schröder; Sudesh Srivastav; Harald Marcel Bonel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 5.315