Literature DB >> 15237243

Late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal as a strategy to prevent graft loss in patients with suboptimal kidney transplant function.

Matthew R Weir1, Steven Blahut, Cinthia Drachenburg, Cindi Young, John Papademitriou, David K Klassen, Charles B Cangro, Stephen T Bartlett, Jeffrey C Fink.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Chronic allograft nephropathy is a major cause of progressive renal failure in renal transplant recipients. Its etiology is multifactorial and may include both immunologic and nonimmunologic causes. In this observational cohort study we set out to see if calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal would reduce the likelihood of graft loss.
METHODS: One hundred and five renal transplant recipients with impaired kidney function (mean serum creatinine 3.0 +/- 0.1 mg/dl) and biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy had the dose of their calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine (CSA), or tacrolimus (FK), reduced or discontinued with either the addition of, or continuation of mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose corticosteroids. This intervention occurred at a mean of 29.0 +/- 2.7 months after transplantation. Follow-up after intervention was 54.3 +/- 4.1 months in the reduced CSA group (n = 64), 41.6 +/- 3.2 months in the reduced FK group (n = 28), and 75.5 +/- 6.7 months in the calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal group (n = 13).
RESULTS: There were 24 graft failures in the reduced CSA group, 9 graft failures in the reduced FK group, and 1 graft lost in the calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal group. The unadjusted relative risk for graft failure in the CSA and FK groups combined (confidence interval 1.05-31.6), was 4.07 using the calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal group as the reference, p = 0.05. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for baseline covariates including age, gender, race, type of transplant, delayed graft function, baseline blood pressure and random serum glucose and cholesterol demonstrated that only calcineurin inhibitor dose reduction but not withdrawal, older age, delayed graft function, higher serum creatinine at the time of intervention, and higher diastolic blood pressure and serum glucose, correlated with graft loss. Only 6 of the 105 patients developed Banff grade acute rejection. All responded to steroid therapy. We conclude that although this observational cohort study may have a selection bias, late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy and impaired kidney function appears safe and durable as a treatment strategy to reduce the likelihood of graft failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15237243     DOI: 10.1159/000079390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nephrol        ISSN: 0250-8095            Impact factor:   3.754


  9 in total

1.  Sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal immunosuppressive regimen in kidney transplantation: a single center experience.

Authors:  Sameer M Alarrayed; Amgad E El-Agroudy; Ahmad S Alarrayed; Sumaya M Al Ghareeb; Taysir S Garadah; Salah Y El-Sharqawi; Ali H Al-Aradi; Balaji G Dandi; Sadiq Abdulla
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Lifetime cost-effectiveness of calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal after de novo renal transplantation.

Authors:  Stephanie R Earnshaw; Christopher N Graham; William D Irish; Reiko Sato; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

Review 4.  Treatment strategies to minimize or prevent chronic allograft dysfunction in pediatric renal transplant recipients: an overview.

Authors:  Britta Höcker; Burkhard Tönshoff
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result.

Authors:  Titte R Srinivas; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  A four-drug combination therapy consisting of low-dose tacrolimus, low-dose mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, and mizoribine in living donor renal transplantation: A randomized study.

Authors:  Tian-Zhong Yan; Xiao-Qiang Wu; Lu Rong
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-05-11

7.  A Randomized 2x2 Factorial Clinical Trial of Renal Transplantation: Steroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression with Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal after Six Months Associates with Improved Renal Function and Reduced Chronic Histopathology.

Authors:  R Brian Stevens; Kirk W Foster; Clifford D Miles; Andre C Kalil; Diana F Florescu; John P Sandoz; Theodore H Rigley; Tamer Malik; Lucile E Wrenshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Early Kidney Allograft Dysfunction (Threatened Allograft): Comparative Effectiveness of Continuing Versus Discontinuation of Tacrolimus and Use of Sirolimus to Prevent Graft Failure: A Retrospective Patient-Centered Outcome Study.

Authors:  Ravinder K Wali; Heather A Prentice; Venkata Reddivari; Geroge Baffoe-Bonnie; Cinthia I Drachenberg; John C Pappadimitriou; Emilio Ramos; Matthew Cooper; Johann Jonsson; Stephen Bartlett; Matthew R Weir
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2016-08-11

9.  Deferred pre-emptive switch from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus leads to improvement in GFR and expansion of T regulatory cell population: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Dinesh Bansal; Ashok K Yadav; Vinod Kumar; Mukut Minz; Vinay Sakhuja; Vivekanand Jha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.