OBJECTIVES: To introduce a simple method of dosing over-the-counter medication in a home setting using a color-coding concept and to compare dosing deviation from recommended dosage using the color-coded method with dosing deviation using conventional package labeling. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING:Pediatric emergency center at a tertiary care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 101 caregivers of children with nonemergent complaints separated into 2 groups. One group used a conventional dosing method and the other group used a color-coded method to determine and measure a dose of acetaminophen for their child. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For both dose determination and dose measuring, percentage of deviation from recommended acetaminophen dosage was calculated and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in sociodemographic characteristics between the 2 groups. How-ever, for dose determination, the average deviation (25.8% vs 1.7%) and median deviation (1% vs 0%) from recommended dosage were both higher for the group using conventional methods compared with the group using the color-coded method. The Wilcoxon rank sum test indicated that the median deviation was significantly different between the 2 groups (P<.001). Similar results were obtained for dose measuring. The average deviation (29% vs 0.5%) and the median deviation (17.2% vs 0%) from recommended dosage were higher for the group using conventional methods compared with the group using the color-coded method. The median deviation was also significantly different between the 2 groups (P<.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a marked improvement in caregivers' ability to correctly determine and measure an over-the-counter medication for their child using a color-coded method compared with conventional methods.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To introduce a simple method of dosing over-the-counter medication in a home setting using a color-coding concept and to compare dosing deviation from recommended dosage using the color-coded method with dosing deviation using conventional package labeling. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Pediatric emergency center at a tertiary care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 101 caregivers of children with nonemergent complaints separated into 2 groups. One group used a conventional dosing method and the other group used a color-coded method to determine and measure a dose of acetaminophen for their child. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For both dose determination and dose measuring, percentage of deviation from recommended acetaminophen dosage was calculated and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in sociodemographic characteristics between the 2 groups. How-ever, for dose determination, the average deviation (25.8% vs 1.7%) and median deviation (1% vs 0%) from recommended dosage were both higher for the group using conventional methods compared with the group using the color-coded method. The Wilcoxon rank sum test indicated that the median deviation was significantly different between the 2 groups (P<.001). Similar results were obtained for dose measuring. The average deviation (29% vs 0.5%) and the median deviation (17.2% vs 0%) from recommended dosage were higher for the group using conventional methods compared with the group using the color-coded method. The median deviation was also significantly different between the 2 groups (P<.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a marked improvement in caregivers' ability to correctly determine and measure an over-the-counter medication for their child using a color-coded method compared with conventional methods.
Authors: H Shonna Yin; Ruth M Parker; Lee M Sanders; Alan Mendelsohn; Benard P Dreyer; Stacy Cooper Bailey; Deesha A Patel; Jessica J Jimenez; Kwang-Youn A Kim; Kara Jacobson; Michelle C J Smith; Laurie Hedlund; Nicole Meyers; Terri McFadden; Michael S Wolf Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: William T Basco; Myla Ebeling; Sandra S Garner; Thomas C Hulsey; Kit Simpson Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: H Shonna Yin; Ruth M Parker; Lee M Sanders; Benard P Dreyer; Alan L Mendelsohn; Stacy Bailey; Deesha A Patel; Jessica J Jimenez; Kwang-Youn A Kim; Kara Jacobson; Laurie Hedlund; Michelle C J Smith; Leslie Maness Harris; Terri McFadden; Michael S Wolf Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kathleen E Walsh; Sarah L Cutrona; Patricia L Kavanagh; Lori E Crosby; Chris Malone; Katie Lobner; David G Bundy Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Tiffany A Williams; Michael S Wolf; Ruth M Parker; Lee M Sanders; Stacy Bailey; Alan L Mendelsohn; Benard P Dreyer; Jessica J Velazquez; H Shonna Yin Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Leigh M Howard; José A Tique; Sandra Gaveta; Mohsin Sidat; Russell L Rothman; Sten H Vermund; Philip J Ciampa Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Courtney D Thornburg; Zora R Rogers; Michael R Jeng; Sohail R Rana; Rathi V Iyer; Lane Faughnan; Leann Hassen; Jennifer Marshall; Roy P McDonald; Winfred C Wang; Xiangke Huang; Renée C Rees Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.167