Literature DB >> 15236028

Circulatory responses to epidural blockade of treated and untreated hypertensive patients.

H Y Jin1, R Tanaka.   

Abstract

The circulatory effects of epidural blockade were studied in 82 hypertensive patients. To compare the circulatory responses to epidural blockade between treated and untreated hypertensive patients, patients were divided into 60 treated and 22 untreated hypertensive patients groups, and to confirm the magnitude of hemodynamic changes according to the segment of epidural approach, each group was then subdivided into 3 groups as cervical, thoracic and lumbar. The blood pressure and the pulse rate were measured before and after establishment of epidural blockade. The baseline blood pressure of untreated group was significantly higher than that of treated one (P < 0.05), but there was no difference between two groups in the initial pulse rate. At 20 min after meperidine administration to epidural space, blood pressure drop was more pronounced in untreated thoracic subgroup than in treated one (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in blood pressure drop between treated and untreated groups of cervical and lumbar blockade. Regarding the pulse rate change, there was no significant difference between treated and untreated cases of all the subgroups. The rate of fluid load required to maintain the adequate blood pressure in the first 20 min of epidural blockade was more in treated than in untreated cases of cervical subgroup. During surgery the administration of vasopressor agents was more frequently required to maintain blood pressure in treated and untreated thoracic subgroups, while the administration of vasodilator agents was more frequent in treated and untreated cases of cervical and thoracic subgroups. The incidence of rebound hypertension was relatively high in untreated cervical and thoracic subgroups as compared to treated ones.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 15236028     DOI: 10.1007/s0054090030132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular effects of extradural anaesthesia.

Authors:  M A Stanton-Hicks
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  The effects of an acute reduction in blood pressure by means of differential spinal sympathetic block on the cerebral circulation of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  S S KETY; B D KING; S M HORVATH; W S JEFFERS; J H HAFKENSCHIEL
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1950-04       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Risks of general anesthesia and elective operation in the hypertensive patient.

Authors:  L Goldman; D L Caldera
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Increased activity in left ventricular receptors during hemorrhage or occlusion of caval veins in the cat. A possible cause of the vaso-vagal reaction.

Authors:  B Oberg; P Thorén
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1972-06

5.  The role of the venous system in cardiocirculatory dynamics during spinal and epidural anesthesia in man.

Authors:  S Shimosato; B E Etsten
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension. I. Cardiovascular responses of treated and untreated patients.

Authors:  C Prys-Roberts; R Meloche; P Foëx
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension. VI: Cardiovascular responses to extradural blockade of treated and untreated hypertensive patients.

Authors:  J Dagnino; C Prys-Roberts
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Interactions of anaesthesia and high pre-operative doses of beta-receptor antagonists.

Authors:  C Prys-Roberts
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1982
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.