Literature DB >> 15235790

[Survey on practice of regional anaesthesia in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Part 3: Methods in obstetric anaesthesia].

E Bartusseck1, S Fatehi, J Motsch, T Grau.   

Abstract

The practice of regional anaesthesia in German speaking countries was investigated by a survey. The last part of the trilogy contains the presentation and evaluation of the data about the methods in obstetric anaesthesia. In 2002 questionnaires were mailed to 750 randomly selected departments of anaesthesia, 384 hospitals (51.2%) responded of which 278 had an obstetric unit. Caesarean section rate was 22.5+/-8.2% and for elective caesarean section spinal anaesthesia was mostly used. General anaesthesia was never used in 58.3% of Swiss, 10.2% of German, and 21.1% of Austrian hospitals. For non-elective caesarean section 42.1% of the hospitals often used a spinal anaesthesia, and 44.8% sometimes, in Switzerland these were 92.9% and 7.1%, respectively. Pain relief for labour was usually achieved with epidural anaesthesia or drugs. The trend from general to regional anaesthesia for caesarean section is continued, as is the trend from local infiltrative techniques to epidural anaesthesia for vaginal delivery. Switzerland was in the forefront for these developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15235790     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-004-0719-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  16 in total

1.  [Recent developments in obstetric regional anesthesia. A review of experiences at the Eppendorf University Hospital].

Authors:  T Standl; S Wilhelm; A Gnirke; B Hüneke
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 0.698

2.  A survey of anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  G W Brown; I F Russell
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.603

3.  Anaesthesia for caesarean section--a German survey.

Authors:  U M Stamer; A Messerschmidt; H Wulf
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  [Current practices in anesthesia for cesarean section in german university clinics. Results of a survey in the year 1996].

Authors:  H Wulf; U Stamer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [The current standing of obstetrical analgesia and anesthesia. A survey of North Rhein-Westfalia].

Authors:  T Meuser; S Grond; J Lynch; M F Irnich; K A Lehmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Practice of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a German survey.

Authors:  U M Stamer; A Messerschmidt; H Wulf; A Hoeft
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992.

Authors:  J L Hawkins; C P Gibbs; M Orleans; G Martin-Salvaj; B Beaty
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  [Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia in Switzerland in 1999].

Authors:  G Zwetsch-Rast; M C Schneider; M Siegemund
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [Survey on practice of regional anaesthesia in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Part 1: Quality assurance and training concepts].

Authors:  E Bartusseck; S Fatehi; J Motsch; T Grau
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  [Anesthesia in cesarean section in the FRG in 1997. Results of a nationwide survey].

Authors:  H Schneck; R Wagner; M Scheller; B von Hundelshausen; E Kochs
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 0.698

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: identification of risk factors using an anesthesia information management system.

Authors:  F Brenck; B Hartmann; C Katzer; R Obaid; D Brüggmann; M Benson; R Röhrig; A Junger
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  [A survey of labour pain management in Germany].

Authors:  T Meuser; R Wiese; D Molitor; S Grond; U M Stamer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Levobupivacaine for parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery. A dose-finding investigation].

Authors:  D H Bremerich; S Kuschel; N Fetsch; B Zwissler; C Byhahn; D Meininger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Which types of peripheral nerve blocks should be included in residency training programs?

Authors:  Marcia A Corvetto; Ghislaine C Echevarria; Ana M Espinoza; Fernando R Altermatt
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Current Practice in Obstetric Anesthesia and Analgesia in Public Hospitals of Greece: A 2016 National Survey

Authors:  Chryssoula Staikou; Alexandros Μakris; Kassiani Theodoraki; Athanasia Τsaroucha; Amalia Douma; Eleni Μoka; Eleni Αrnaoutoglou; Tilemahos Paraskevopoulos; Ioanna Siafaka; Efi Stavropoulou; Eriphili Αrgyra
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.021

6.  Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study.

Authors:  Charles S Algert; Jennifer R Bowen; Warwick B Giles; Greg E Knoblanche; Samantha J Lain; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 8.775

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.