A dominant negative Galphas mutant that prevents thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor activation of cAMP production and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate turnover: competition by different G proteins for activation by a common receptor.

A Ser to Asn mutation at position 54 of the alpha subunit of G(s) (designated N54-alpha(s)) was characterized after transient expression of it with various components of the receptor-adenylyl cyclase pathway in COS-1, COS-7, and HEK 293 cells. Previous studies of the N54-alpha(s) mutant revealed that it has a conditional dominant negative phenotype that prevents hormone-stimulated increases in cAMP without interfering with the regulation of basal cAMP levels (Cleator, J. H., Mehta, N. D., Kurtz, D. K., Hildebrandt, J. D. (1999) FEBS Lett. 243, 205-208). Experiments reported here were conducted to localize the mechanism of the dominant negative effect of the mutant. Competition studies conducted with activated alpha(s)* (Q212L) showed that the N54 mutant did not work down-stream by blocking the interaction of endogenous alpha(s) with adenylyl cyclase. The co-expression of wild type or N54-alpha(s) along with the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor and adenylyl cyclase isotypes differing with respect to betagamma stimulation (AC II or AC III) revealed that the phenotype of the mutant is not dependent upon the presence of adenylyl cyclase isoforms regulated by betagamma. These studies ruled out a downstream site of action of the mutant. To investigate an upstream site of action, N54-alpha(s) was co-expressed with either the TSH receptor that activates both alpha(s) and alpha(q) or with the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor that activates only alpha(q). N54-alpha(s) failed to inhibit alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor stimulation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate production but did inhibit TSH stimulation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. These results show that G(s) and G(q) compete for activation by the TSH receptor. They also indicate that the N54 protein has a dominant negative phenotype by blocking upstream receptor interactions with normal G proteins. This phenotype is different from that seen in analogous mutants of other G protein alpha subunits and suggests that either regulation or protein-protein interactions differ among G protein alpha subunits.