Literature DB >> 15234897

Stomata open at night in pole-sized and mature ponderosa pine: implications for O3 exposure metrics.

N E Grulke1, R Alonso, T Nguyen, C Cascio, W Dobrowolski.   

Abstract

Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws.) is widely distributed in the western USA. We report the lack of stomatal closure at night in early summer for ponderosa pine at two of three sites investigated. Trees at a third site with lower nitrogen dioxide and nitric acid exposure, but greater drought stress, had slightly open stomata at night in early summer but closed stomata at night for the rest of the summer. The three sites had similar background ozone exposure during the summer of measurement (2001). Nighttime stomatal conductance (gs) ranged from one tenth to one fifth that of maximum daytime values. In general, pole-sized trees (< 40 years old) had greater nighttime gs than mature trees (> 250 years old). In late summer, nighttime gs was low (< 3.0 mmol H2O m(-2) s(-1)) for both tree size classes at all sites. Measurable nighttime gs has also been reported in other conifers, but the values we observed were higher. In June, nighttime ozone (O3) uptake accounted for 9, 5 and 3% of the total daily O3 uptake of pole-sized trees from west to east across the San Bernardino Mountains. In late summer, O3 uptake at night was < 2% of diel uptake at all sites. Nocturnal O3 uptake may contribute to greater oxidant injury development, especially in pole-sized trees in early summer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15234897     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/24.9.1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  8 in total

Review 1.  Nighttime stomatal conductance and transpiration in C3 and C4 plants.

Authors:  Mairgareth A Caird; James H Richards; Lisa A Donovan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Model-based analysis of avoidance of ozone stress by stomatal closure in Siebold's beech (Fagus crenata).

Authors:  Yasutomo Hoshika; Makoto Watanabe; Naoki Inada; Takayoshi Koike
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Helianthus nighttime conductance and transpiration respond to soil water but not nutrient availability.

Authors:  Ava R Howard; Lisa A Donovan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Stricter ozone ambient air quality standard has beneficial effect on ponderosa pine in California.

Authors:  David T Tingey; William E Hogsett; E Henry Lee; John A Laurence
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  The response to daylight or continuous ozone of phenylpropanoid and lignin biosynthesis pathways in poplar differs between leaves and wood.

Authors:  Nicolas Richet; Koffi Tozo; Dany Afif; Jacques Banvoy; Sylvain Legay; Pierre Dizengremel; Mireille Cabané
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Ozone exposure-response relationships parametrized for sixteen tree species with varying sensitivity in the United States.

Authors:  E Henry Lee; Christian P Andersen; Peter A Beedlow; David T Tingey; Seiji Koike; Jean-Jacques Dubois; S Douglas Kaylor; Kristopher Novak; R Byron Rice; Howard S Neufeld; Jeffrey D Herrick
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.755

Review 7.  Rationale: Photosynthesis of Vascular Plants in Dim Light.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wang; Yong Wang; Aifeng Ling; Zhen Guo; Muhammad Asim; Fupeng Song; Qing Wang; Yanguo Sun; Rayyan Khan; Huifeng Yan; Yi Shi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Ozone uptake at night is more damaging to plants than equivalent day-time flux.

Authors:  Eleni Goumenaki; Ignacio González-Fernández; Jeremy D Barnes
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.116

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.