Literature DB >> 15234233

Are multiple markers the future of prostate cancer diagnostics?

Stephen D Mikolajczyk1, Yong Song, James R Wong, Robert S Matson, Harry G Rittenhouse.   

Abstract

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is the most successful and widely employed cancer serum marker in use today. There is growing evidence that the introduction of wide PSA screening and earlier detection can result in decreased cancer mortality associated with a decline in metastatic disease. PSA circulates in a number of distinct forms. Measurement of these in addition to total PSA significantly increases diagnostic utility. Diagnostic utility is likely to be further increased by adding kallikreins, cytokines, growth factors, receptors and cellular adhesion factors to the biomarker panel. The need for multiple markers reflects the multidimensional nature of prostate disease which ranges from metastatic cancer to indolent cancer to benign hyperplasia and inflammation, all of which require distinct treatments and medical interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15234233     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  21 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of operating characteristics of prostate cancer detection biomarkers.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Donna P Ankerst; Norma S Ketchum; Barbara Ercole; Girish Shah; John D Shaughnessy; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Enzymes and related proteins as cancer biomarkers: a proteomic approach.

Authors:  Shu-Ling Liang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Twenty Years of PSA: From Prostate Antigen to Tumor Marker.

Authors:  Gabriela De Angelis; Harry G Rittenhouse; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; L Blair Shamel; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 4.  Tumor-associated antigen arrays for the serological diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Carlos A Casiano; Melanie Mediavilla-Varela; Eng M Tan
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Validity of Prostate Health Index and Percentage of [-2] Pro-Prostate-Specific Antigen as Novel Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Omani Tertiary Hospitals Experience.

Authors:  Safana S Al Saidi; Nafila B Al Riyami; Mohammed S Al Marhoon; Mohammed S Al Saraf; Salim S Al Busaidi; Riad Bayoumi; Waad-Allah S Mula-Abed
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-07

6.  Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a screening test in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Necati Muşlu; Bahadır Ercan; Serin Akbayır; Şenay Balcı; H Didem Ovla; Murat Bozlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-01-06

7.  Immunoassay for the discrimination of free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) forms with internal cleavages at Lys(₁₄₅) or Lys(₁₄₆) from fPSA without internal cleavages at Lys(₁₄₅) or Lys(₁₄₆).

Authors:  Mari T Peltola; Pauliina Niemelä; Kalle Alanen; Martti Nurmi; Hans Lilja; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  Aberrant PSA glycosylation--a sweet predictor of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Gilgunn; Paul J Conroy; Radka Saldova; Pauline M Rudd; Richard J O'Kennedy
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Emerging PSA-based tests to improve screening.

Authors:  Richard J Bryant; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.241

10.  Proteomic Profiling of Serum-Derived Exosomes from Ethnically Diverse Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  David Turay; Salma Khan; Carlos J Diaz Osterman; Matthew P Curtis; Balreet Khaira; Jonathan W Neidigh; Saied Mirshahidi; Carlos A Casiano; Nathan R Wall
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.