Literature DB >> 15234139

Using InterWave aberrometry to measure and improve the quality of vision in LASIK surgery.

Keith P Thompson1, P Randall Staver, Jose R Garcia, Stephen A Burns, Robert H Webb, R Doyle Stulting.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare visual outcomes in eyes undergoing aberrometry-guided (InterWave) LASIK with those in eyes undergoing standard LASIK treatment based upon refractive measures.
DESIGN: Single-center, comparative, interventional, consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred two consecutive eyes undergoing LASIK were analyzed retrospectively. One group, 106 eyes undergoing primary LASIK and 224 eyes undergoing LASIK enhancement, was treated with standard LASIK treatment using a 5.5-mm optical zone, 1.5-mm transition zone laser with the settings determined by manifest refraction. The second group, 44 untreated (primary) eyes and 28 previously treated (enhancement) eyes, received a multipass, multistage treatment in which the laser settings for each stage were determined by aberrometry measurements. Eyes with desired monovision (undercorrected) outcome and preoperative hyperopia were excluded from the study. INTERVENTION: An aberrometry-guided laser treatment (InterWave LASIK) was compared with the standard LASIK treatment based upon the manifest refraction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (VA), manifest refraction, best spectacle-corrected VA (BSCVA), severity of halos, and root mean square (RMS) retinal blur area measured at 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Three months postoperatively there was no difference in uncorrected VA, BSCVA, refraction, or RMS retinal blur areas for pupil sizes of 3.5 mm between eyes treated by InterWave and those treated by standard LASIK. However, InterWave LASIK reduced the retinal blur area by 48% (P<0.0103) and 58% (P<0.0004) in primary cases and 43% (P<0.0430) and 74% (P<0.0271) in enhancement cases, respectively, for pupil sizes of 4.5 and 6.5 mm relative to standard LASIK treatments. Patients undergoing InterWave-guided treatment reported less severity of halo (0.37 vs. 0.98 [P<0.016] for primary cases and 0.35 vs. 0.73 [P<0.04] for enhancement cases).
CONCLUSION: InterWave LASIK achieved acuity and refractive results equivalent to those of standard LASIK treatment based upon refraction, but resulted in superior quality mesopic vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15234139      PMCID: PMC1458373          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  14 in total

1.  Measurement of ocular local wavefront distortion with a spatially resolved refractometer.

Authors:  R H Webb; C M Penney; K P Thompson
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Measurement of the wave-front aberration of the eye by a fast psychophysical procedure.

Authors:  J C He; S Marcos; R H Webb; S A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis under a corneal flap for myopia of 2 to 20 diopters.

Authors:  T Salah; G O Waring; A el Maghraby; K Moadel; S B Grimm
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  T Oshika; S D Klyce; R A Applegate; H C Howland; M A El Danasoury
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Quantitative descriptors of corneal shape derived from computer-assisted analysis of photokeratographs.

Authors:  S A Dingeldein; S D Klyce; S E Wilson
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

6.  Determination of corneal image-forming properties from corneal topography.

Authors:  R K Maloney; S J Bogan; G O Waring
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 7.  Principles of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry.

Authors:  L N Thibos
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Limits to vision: can we do better than nature?

Authors:  R A Applegate
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Super vision: dream or reality.

Authors:  M C Arbelaez
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Multipass versus single pass photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia using a scanning laser.

Authors:  M Pop; Y Payette
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

1.  New Objective Refraction Metric Based on Sphere Fitting to the Wavefront.

Authors:  Mateusz Jaskulski; Andreí Martínez-Finkelshtein; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.909

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.