Literature DB >> 15234060

An evaluation of radiation exposure from portal films taken during definitive course of pediatric radiotherapy.

Rajat J Kudchadker1, Eric L Chang, Fatima Bryan, Moshe H Maor, Robin Famiglietti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, considerable attention has been directed toward computed tomography radiation doses (estimated 1 to 4 cGy) received by pediatric patients, because of the potential for increasing a pediatric patient's risk for developing a secondary malignancy. However, minimal attention has been given to the radiation exposure outside the treatment field resulting from the use of portal films to visualize surrounding anatomy. The objective of this study was to quantify the radiation dose from portal imaging delivered within and outside the radiation treatment field during a course of radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review was conducted of the port film dose for 56 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent definitive radiation therapy between January 2001 and January 2002. Treatment locations were classified as brain, 27 patients; abdomen, 11 patients; extremities, 9 patients; pelvis, 6 patients; and thorax, 3 patients. Using the dose per monitor unit and total number of port films taken, the total port film dose for each patient was calculated. In addition, port film dose was quantified for 5 pediatric patients undergoing intensity modulated radiation therapy.
RESULTS: The mean total port dose varied from a maximum of 46 cGy for brain to a minimum of 17 cGy for thorax. The mean total port dose as a percentage of prescribed dose was less than 1.25% for all locations in this study; however, most of the port dose is a result of the open-field dose from the double-exposure technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Care should be exercised while exposing port films of pediatric patients to minimize both the number of films and corresponding radiation exposure without compromising the quality of treatment delivery. Specifically, the number of monitor units used to image regions outside the treatment field should be kept to a minimum, because such exposure could lead to an increased risk of development of secondary neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15234060     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of administered dose using portal images in craniospinal irradiation of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Carina Marques Coelho; Raquel Calçada; Sofia Rodrigues; Juan Antonio Barragán; Ana Cravo Sá; Ana Paula Macedo; Maria de Fátima Monsanto
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 2.  Radiation therapy for children: evolving technologies in the era of ALARA.

Authors:  Larry E Kun; Chris Beltran
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-16

3.  Dose optimisation during imaging in radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Ravindran
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01

4.  Dose comparison of megavoltage cone-beam and orthogonal-pair portal images.

Authors:  Lee-Cheng Peng; Ching-Chong Jack Yang; Sang Sim; Mitchell Weiss; Alex Bielajew
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Doses delivered by portal imaging quality assurance in routine practice of adjuvant breast radiotherapy worth to by monitored and compensated in some cases.

Authors:  Sami Kefs; Jean-Yves Giraud; Julie Naud; Isabelle Henry; Isabelle Gabelle-Flandin; Jacques Balosso; Abdulhamid Chaikh; Camille Verry
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.