Literature DB >> 15233724

The processing of antigens delivered as DNA vaccines.

Mark Howarth1, Tim Elliott.   

Abstract

The ability of DNA vaccines to provide effective immunological protection against infection and tumors depends on their ability to generate good CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses. Priming of these responses is a property of dendritic cells (DCs), and so the efficacy of DNA-encoded vaccines is likely to depend on the way in which the antigens they encode are processed by DCs. This processing could either be via the synthesis of the vaccine-encoded antigen by the DCs themselves or via its uptake by DCs following its synthesis in bystander cells that are unable to prime T cells. These different sources of antigen are likely to engage different antigen-processing pathways, which are the subject of this review. Understanding how to access different processing pathways in DCs may ultimately aid the rational development of plasmid-based vaccines to pathogens and to cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15233724     DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00141.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Rev        ISSN: 0105-2896            Impact factor:   12.988


  9 in total

1.  In vivo electroporation and non-protein based screening assays to identify antibodies against native protein conformations.

Authors:  Pirouz Daftarian; Raquibul Chowdhury; Philip Ames; Changli Wei; Alan D King; Juan Pablo de Rivero Vaccari; Lloye Dillon; Justin Price; Howard Leung; Brittany Ashlock; Enrique Mesri; Victor Perez; Stephan Züchner; Jochen Reiser; Vance Lemmon; Robert W Keane
Journal:  Hybridoma (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-10

2.  Suppression of major histocompatibility complex class II-associated invariant chain enhances the potency of an HIV gp120 DNA vaccine.

Authors:  Xueqing Lu; Shuzhen Wu; Catherine E Blackwell; Robert E Humphreys; Eric von Hofe; Minzhen Xu
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Long-term storage of DNA-free RNA for use in vaccine studies.

Authors:  Kathryn L Jones; Debbie Drane; Eric J Gowans
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.993

4.  Polarization of protective immunity induced by replication-incompetent adenovirus expressing glycoproteins of pseudorabies virus.

Authors:  Young Woo Han; Abi G Aleyas; Junu A George; Seon Ju Kim; Hye Kyung Kim; Hyun A Yoon; Dong Jin Yoo; Seong Ho Kang; Koanhoi Kim; Seong Kug Eo
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 8.718

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Bo Xiang; Adam E Snook; Michael S Magee; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 6.  A Review of the Immunological Mechanisms Following Mucosal Vaccination of Finfish.

Authors:  Hetron Mweemba Munang'andu; Stephen Mutoloki; Øystein Evensen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  A Review of Intra- and Extracellular Antigen Delivery Systems for Virus Vaccines of Finfish.

Authors:  Hetron Mweemba Munang'andu; Øystein Evensen
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.818

8.  An immunoinformatics-derived DNA vaccine encoding human class II T cell epitopes of Ebola virus, Sudan virus, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus is immunogenic in HLA transgenic mice.

Authors:  Callie E Bounds; Frances E Terry; Leonard Moise; Drew Hannaman; William D Martin; Anne S De Groot; John J Suschak; Lesley C Dupuy; Connie S Schmaljohn
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Mucosal delivery of therapeutic and prophylactic molecules using lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Jerry M Wells; Annick Mercenier
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 60.633

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.