Literature DB >> 15233610

Analysis of complaints lodged by patients attending Victorian hospitals, 1997-2001.

David McD Taylor1, Rory S Wolfe, Peter A Cameron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe complaints by patients and compare rates of complaint in demographic subgroups of patients and hospital departments. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective analysis of complaints made by patients attending 67 hospitals (metropolitan, 25; rural, 42) in Victoria, and lodged with the Victorian Health Complaint Information Program (January 1997 - December 2001). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics of patients lodging complaints and the hospital department involved; nature and outcome of complaints.
RESULTS: From a total of over 13 million patients presenting to hospital during the study period, 19 156 patients or their representatives (mostly their parents, children or spouses) lodged 26 785 "issues" of complaint (overall complaint rate, 1.42 complaints/1000 patients). Significantly more complaints (P < 0.001) were lodged by (or on behalf of) female patients (complaint rate ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.3), public patients (rate ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 2.0-2.2) and Australian-born patients (rate ratio, 8.9; 95% CI, 8.3-9.6). The complaint rate for general wards was 6.2/1000 patients (95% CI, 6.1-6.3). Intensive care units had a similar rate of 5.9/1000 (95% CI, 5.4-6.5), but aged-care departments had a significantly higher rate of 45.2/1000 (95% CI, 39.5-51.7), while emergency departments (1.9/1000; 95% CI, 1.8-2.0), operating theatres (1.0/1000; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1), day-procedure units (0.5/1000; 95% CI, 0.5-0.6) and outpatient departments (0.4/1000; 95% CI, 0.4-0.4) had significantly lower rates. Complaints relating to communication (poor attention, discourtesy, rudeness), access to healthcare (no/inadequate service, treatment delays) and treatment (inadequate treatment and nursing care) accounted for 29.2%, 28.5% and 22.5% of complaints, respectively. Most (84.5%) complaints were resolved. Apologies or explanations resolved 27.8% and 27.5% of complaints, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Interventions to decrease the number of complaints in the areas of communication and access to healthcare need to be implemented. The active use of complaint data for quality-improvement activities is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15233610     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06157.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  10 in total

1.  For what reasons do patients file a complaint? A retrospective study on patient rights units' registries.

Authors:  Gülsüm Önal; M Murat Civaner
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

2.  Patient Complaints Emphasize Non-Technical Aspects of Care at a Tertiary Referral Hospital.

Authors:  John D King; Pim A D van Dijk; Celeste L Overbeek; Michiel G J S Hageman; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-03

3.  The Effect of Shared Decisionmaking on Patients' Likelihood of Filing a Complaint or Lawsuit: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Shelby Mader; Connor Houghton; Robert Wenger; Marc A Probst; David A Schoenfeld; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Analysis of complaints to a tertiary care pain clinic over a nine-year period.

Authors:  Angela Mailis-Gagnon; Keith Nicholson; Luis Chaparro
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Patient expectations and the paradigm shift of care in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Fatimah Lateef
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-04

Review 6.  Can shared decision-making reduce medical malpractice litigation? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Benjamin Moulton; Elizabeth Cockle; Mala Mann; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Enhancing medical students' reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development - a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Gabriele Lutz; Nina Pankoke; Hadass Goldblatt; Marzellus Hofmann; Michaela Zupanic
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 8.  Methodological quality of teaching communication skills to undergraduate medical students: a mapping review.

Authors:  Rob Sanson-Fisher; Breanne Hobden; Amy Waller; Natalie Dodd; Lucy Boyd
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Comparison of complaints to the intensive care units and those to the general wards: an analysis using the Healthcare Complaint Analysis Tool in an academic medical center in Taiwan.

Authors:  Jih-Shuin Jerng; Szu-Fen Huang; Hsin-Yu Yu; Yi-Chun Chan; Huang-Ju Liang; Huey-Wen Liang; Jui-Sheng Sun
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy.

Authors:  Tom W Reader; Alex Gillespie; Jane Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 7.035

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.