Literature DB >> 15233491

Disparities in prevalence rates for lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers in Medicaid.

C Daniel Mullins1, Jesse L Cooke, Junling Wang, Fadia T Shaya, Doren Van Hsu, Sandra Brooks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given previous reports of variations in prevalence of cancer in low-income individuals, we sought to determine if disparities in cancer prevalence existed in a similarly-insured Medicaid population.
METHODS: Using Maryland Medicaid administrative claims data, prevalence rates of lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers were calculated for Maryland Medicaid recipients who were continuously eligible during the period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000. Chi-squared tests were used to test the differences across subgroups. Cancer prevalence data were age-adjusted using Maryland Medicaid enrollees as the standard population.
RESULTS: The care prevalence rates for lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers were 75/10,000, 63/10,000, 92/10,000, and 45/10,000, respectively. These rates were 1.2 to 5.2 times those reported at the national level. Generally, higher cancer prevalence rates in certain racial groups in Maryland Medicaid were consistent with previous studies. Regional differences in cancer prevalence existed for each cancer studied.
CONCLUSIONS: Limiting our study sample to a population of uniformly low socioeconomic individuals did not eliminate the disparity in prevalence rates between blacks and whites. Different patterns of racial disparity across regions reported by previous researchers might be due to small area variation in addition to socioeconomic status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15233491      PMCID: PMC2568358     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  16 in total

1.  Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres.

Authors:  John E Wennberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-26

2.  How important are estimates of cancer prevalence?

Authors:  G Giles
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  The period prevalence and costs of treating nonmelanoma skin cancers in patients over 65 years of age covered by medicare.

Authors:  A K Joseph; T L Mark; C Mueller
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends.

Authors:  H L Howe; P A Wingo; M J Thun; L A Ries; H M Rosenberg; E G Feigal; B K Edwards
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Cancer prevalence estimates based on tumour registry data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.

Authors:  R M Merrill; R Capocaccia; E J Feuer; A Mariotto
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; Charles W Given; Caralee Roberts
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-04-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Cancer prevalence and survivorship issues: analyses of the 1992 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  M Hewitt; N Breen; S Devesa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The prevalence of cancer among adults in the United States: 1987.

Authors:  J Byrne; L G Kessler; S S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research.

Authors:  J G Jollis; M Ancukiewicz; E R DeLong; D B Pryor; L H Muhlbaier; D B Mark
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Agreement between physicians' office records and Medicare Part B claims data.

Authors:  J B Fowles; A G Lawthers; J P Weiner; D W Garnick; D S Petrie; R H Palmer
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1995
View more
  3 in total

1.  More on race, genes and preterm delivery...and the environment.

Authors:  Anne Lang Dunlop
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  No Disparity for American Indians in Surgery for Pelvis/Lower Extremity Fractures: a Cohort Study of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB).

Authors:  Alan Cook; Kristina Chapple; Neil Motzkin; Jeanette Ward; Forrest Moore
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-08-23

3.  Economic disparities in treatment costs among ambulatory Medicaid cancer patients.

Authors:  C Daniel Mullins; Stephen E Snyder; Junling Wang; Jesse L Cooke; Claudia Baquet
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.798

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.