Literature DB >> 15233391

Practice analysis: defining the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy.

Edsen B Donato1, Robert E DuVall, Joseph J Godges, Grenith J Zimmerman, David G Greathouse.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Nonexperimental descriptive research design.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of use and perceived level of importance of professional responsibilities, procedures, and knowledge areas by physical therapists practicing in primary contact care settings and to compare these data to similar data from physical therapists practicing in nonprimary contact care settings.
BACKGROUND: Physical therapy services have moved toward a primary contact model of practice in response to changes in the health care delivery system. Several studies have reported the effectiveness of primary contact physical therapy. However, a practice analysis has not been performed to define the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy. METHODS AND MEASURES: A sample of 212 physical therapists practicing as primary contact providers in the military and civilian sectors, and a comparison group of 250 physical therapists not practicing as primary contact providers were surveyed. A Delphi technique was used to develop the survey instrument, which was pretested by a pilot group. The final survey instrument consisted of 171 items. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to examine significant differences among the 3 groups (P<.001).
RESULTS: Of the 212 surveys mailed to the primary contact group, 119 (56.1%) responses were received (82 military physical therapists and 37 civilian physical therapists). Of the 250 surveys mailed to the comparison group, 103 (41.2%) responses were received. There were numerous significant differences among the 3 groups in professional responsibilities, procedures, and knowledge areas, most notably in the areas of selecting and ordering of imaging procedures, identifying signs and symptoms of nonmusculoskeletal conditions, establishing physical therapy diagnoses, and prescribing over-the-counter medications.
CONCLUSION: The study describes the clinical practice of physical therapists functioning in the role of primary contact providers or as members of a diverse team of health care professionals in primary care, which may provide curricular direction to professional, postprofessional, and clinical residency or fellowship-based educational settings.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15233391     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.6.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  10 in total

1.  Case Report: Schizophrenia Discovered during the Patient Interview in a Man with Shoulder Pain Referred for Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Nirtal Shah; Yuka Nakamura
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Ohio physical therapists' accuracy in identifying abnormalities on diagnostic images with and without a clinical vignette.

Authors:  Abby Morris; Chad Cook; Amy Hassen
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10

3.  A COMPARISON BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS' KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGING MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY.

Authors:  Ryan Rundle; Jared Roberts; Gabe Whitney; Steve Mankins; Caleb Dille; Megan Donaldson; Amy Hassen
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-02

4.  Physiotherapists' Experiences with and Perspectives on Implementing an Evidence-Based, Chronic Pain Self-Management Programme in Primary Health Care: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Emily Brewer; Nicole Carnevale; Melissa Ducsharm; Nicole Ellis; Mohammed Khan; Kyle Vader; Jordan Miller
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 5.  Methodological approaches for identifying competencies for the physiotherapy profession: a scoping review.

Authors:  Stephanie Scodras; Kyla Alsbury-Nealy; Heather Colquhoun; Euson Yeung; Susan B Jaglal; Nancy M Salbach
Journal:  Discov Educ       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Inter-rater reliability and validity of the screenassist lumbar questionnaire: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shala Cunningham
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-12

7.  Diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity and specificity of the ScreenAssist Lumbar Questionnaire in comparison with primary care provider tests and measures of low back pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shala Cunningham
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-02

8.  How to report professional practice in nursing? A scoping review.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Poitras; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Martin Fortin; Frances Gallagher
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-05-25

9.  Determining the impact of a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for back pain: protocol for a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jordan Miller; David Barber; Catherine Donnelly; Simon French; Michael Green; Jonathan Hill; Joy MacDermid; Jacquelyn Marsh; Kathleen Norman; Julie Richardson; Monica Taljaard; Timothy Wideman; Lynn Cooper; Colleen McPhee
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Depicting individual responses to physical therapist led chronic pain self-management support with pain science education and exercise in primary health care: multiple case studies.

Authors:  Jordan Miller; Joy C MacDermid; Julie Richardson; David M Walton; Anita Gross
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2017-04-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.