Literature DB >> 1523339

Efficacy of spot compression-magnification and tangential views in mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses.

R M Faulk1, E A Sickles.   

Abstract

To define the role of special mammographic views in evaluating palpable breast masses, 70 consecutive women with palpable breast masses underwent standard two-view examination of each breast and spot compression-magnification and tangential view examination of the palpable mass. Thirty palpable masses were found in 30 patients (43%). Standard views depicted 26 masses (87%). Tangential views also depicted 26 masses. Some of the masses seen on tangential views were not seen on standard views and vice versa. Spot compression-magnification views depicted 29 masses (97%). Special views thus depicted an additional 9% of palpable masses not seen on standard views (four of 44 cases). All lesions not seen on tangential views were central; the one lesion not seen on spot compression-magnification views was peripheral. Special views allowed correct prediction of benign or malignant status in 77% of cases (23 of 30), while standard views allowed correct prediction in 69% of cases (18 of 26).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1523339     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  3 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.

Authors:  Mitra Noroozian; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Sahand Rahnama-Moghadam; Katherine A Klein; Deborah O Jeffries; Renee W Pinsky; Heang-Ping Chan; Paul L Carson; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.

Authors:  M J Kim; J H Youk; D R Kang; S H Choi; J Y Kwak; E J Son; E-K Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Masses in the era of screening tomosynthesis: Is diagnostic ultrasound sufficient?

Authors:  Sadia Choudhery; Jessica Axmacher; Amy Lynn Conners; Jennifer Geske; Kathy Brandt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.