| Literature DB >> 1523321 |
W F Dähnert1, M H Hoagland, U M Hamper, Y S Erozan, J C Peirce.
Abstract
Four fine-needle aspiration biopsy needles with different tip configurations were used in 133 patients with abdominal lesions. The 20-gauge needles were used in random sequence by several physicians. The specimen from each of the 522 needle passes was evaluated by two cytopathologists for adequacy to render a diagnosis and for the presence of cell block material. The Franseen needle produced a 16% and 9% better yield for diagnostic material than did the cut biopsy and spinal needles (P less than .05), respectively. The Westcott needle was better than the cut biopsy needle by 13%, and the spinal needle produced an 11% better yield than did the cut biopsy needle. Differences did not exist in liver biopsies but were present in pancreatic biopsies. The spinal needle was the least successful in yielding cell block material. Use of the cut biopsy needle resulted in the largest proportion of inadequate specimens, except its yield in cell blocks in the liver was 25% higher than that of the Westcott needle. The authors conclude that not all unusual designs for 20-gauge needle tips render results superior to those of the simple spinal needle.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1523321 DOI: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiology ISSN: 0033-8419 Impact factor: 11.105