Literature DB >> 1523308

Staging of cervical cancer: reliability of transrectal US.

P Innocenti1, F Pulli, L Savino, A Nicolucci, A Pandimiglio, I Menchi, G Massi.   

Abstract

One hundred twenty-four patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix were examined with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before treatment. Since surgery preceded any other kind of therapy, sonographic findings could be compared with the surgical pathologic stage. The accuracy of staging with TRUS was 83%, compared with an accuracy of 78% for clinical staging performed according to the criteria of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). For extent of parametrial involvement, the sensitivity of TRUS evaluation was 78%, with a specificity of 89% and a diagnostic accuracy of 87%. The same reliability parameters for clinical evaluation were 52%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. From these data and from analysis of the cases--in which a discrepancy between clinical and TRUS staging was observed--it can be concluded that TRUS could be usefully applied to routine pretreatment evaluation of patients with cervical carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1523308     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  A Melville; A Eastwood; J Kleijnen; H Kitchener; P Martin-Hirsch; L Nelson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Juan Luis Alcázar; Sara Arribas; José Angel Mínguez; Matías Jurado
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-10-08

3.  Local experience in cervical cancer imaging: Comparison in tumour assessment between TRUS and MRI.

Authors:  Claudia Ordeanu; Diana Cristina Pop; Radu Badea; Csaba Csutak; Nicolae Todor; Calin Ordeanu; Reka Kerekes; Ovidiu Coza; Viorica Nagy; Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu; Alexandru Irimie
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  Feasibility of transrectal ultrasonography for assessment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M P Schmid; R Pötter; P Brader; A Kratochwil; G Goldner; K Kirchheiner; A Sturdza; C Kirisits
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?

Authors:  Ingfrid S Haldorsen; Njål Lura; Jan Blaakær; Daniela Fischerova; Henrica M J Werner
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO II to III Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma Under Radical Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging.

Authors:  Lele Zang; Qin Chen; Xiaozhen Zhang; Xiaohong Zhong; Jian Chen; Yi Fang; An Lin; Min Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Miniaturized phased-array ultrasound and photoacoustic endoscopic imaging system.

Authors:  Maryam Basij; Yan Yan; Suhail S Alshahrani; Hamid Helmi; Timothy K Burton; Jay W Burmeister; Michael M Dominello; Ira S Winer; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-07-25

8.  Prospective intra/inter-observer evaluation of pre-brachytherapy cervical cancer tumor width measured in TRUS and MR imaging.

Authors:  Mario Federico; Carmen Rosa Hernandez-Socorro; Ivone Ribeiro; Jesus Gonzalez Martin; Maria Dolores Rey-Baltar Oramas; Marta Lloret Saez-Bravo; Pedro Carlos Lara Jimenez
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.