Literature DB >> 15232730

Spatial aggregation across ephemeral resource patches in insect communities: an adaptive response to natural enemies?

Marko Rohlfs1, Thomas S Hoffmeister.   

Abstract

Although an increase in competition is a common cost associated with intraspecific crowding, spatial aggregation across food-limited resource patches is a widespread phenomenon in many insect communities. Because intraspecific aggregation of competing insect larvae across, e.show $132#g. fruits, dung, mushrooms etc., is an important means by which many species can coexist (aggregation model of species coexistence), there is a strong need to explore the mechanisms that contribute to the maintenance of this kind of spatial resource exploitation. In the present study, by using Drosophila-parasitoid interactions as a model system, we tested the hypothesis whether intraspecific aggregation reflects an adaptive response to natural enemies. Most of the studies that have hitherto been carried out on Drosophila-parasitoid interactions used an almost two-dimensional artificial host environment, where host larvae could not escape from parasitoid attacks, and have demonstrated positive density-dependent parasitism risk. To test whether these studies captured the essence of such interactions, we used natural breeding substrates (decaying fruits). In a first step, we analysed the parasitism risk of Drosophila larvae on a three-dimensional substrate in natural fly communities in the field, and found that the risk of parasitism decreased with increasing host larval density (inverse density dependence). In a second step, we analysed the parasitism risk of Drosophila subobscura larvae on three breeding substrate types exposed to the larval parasitoids Asobara tabida and Leptopilina heterotoma. We found direct density-dependent parasitism on decaying sloes, inverse density dependence on plums, and a hump-shaped relationship between fly larval density and parasitism risk on crab apples. On crab apples and plums, fly larvae benefited from a density-dependent refuge against the parasitoids. While the proportion of larvae feeding within the fruit tissues increased with larval density, larvae within the fruit tissues were increasingly less likely to become victims of parasitoids than those exposed at the fruit surface. This suggests a facilitating effect of group-feeding larvae on reaching the spatial refuge. We conclude that spatial aggregation in Drosophila communities can at least in part be explained as a predator avoidance strategy, whereby natural enemies act as selective agents maintaining spatial patterns of resource utilisation in their host communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15232730     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1629-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

Review 1.  Joining and avoidance behavior in nonsocial insects.

Authors:  R J Prokopy; B D Roitberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation.

Authors:  J K Parrish; L Edelstein-Keshet
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  An evolutionary explanation of the aggregation model of species coexistence.

Authors:  Marko Rohlfs; Thomas S Hoffmeister
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Host habitat finding and host selection of theDrosophila parasitoidLeptopilina australis (Hymenoptera, Eucoilidae), with a comparison of the niches of EuropeanLeptopilina species.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Alphen; Göran Nordlander; Irene Eijs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Explaining local species diversity.

Authors:  B Shorrocks; J G Sevenster
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Placing biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in context: environmental perturbations and the effects of species richness in a stream field experiment.

Authors:  Brendan G McKie; Markus Schindler; Mark O Gessner; Björn Malmqvist
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A simple assay to study social behavior in Drosophila: measurement of social space within a group.

Authors:  A F Simon; M-T Chou; E D Salazar; T Nicholson; N Saini; S Metchev; D E Krantz
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  History Matters: Oviposition Resource Acceptance in an Exploiter of a Nursery Pollination Mutualism.

Authors:  Pratibha Yadav; Sathish Desireddy; Srinivasan Kasinathan; Jean-Marie Bessière; Renee M Borges
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Host-parasitoid interaction as affected by interkingdom competition.

Authors:  Marko Rohlfs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effect of chemical information on the spatial distribution of fruit flies: I Model results.

Authors:  Marjolein E Lof; Rampal S Etienne; James Powell; Maarten de Gee; Lia Hemerik
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Drosophila social clustering is disrupted by anesthetics and in narrow abdomen ion channel mutants.

Authors:  E D Burg; S T Langan; H A Nash
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  Dispersal strategies of phytophagous insects at a local scale: adaptive potential of aphids in an agricultural environment.

Authors:  Eric Lombaert; Roger Boll; Laurent Lapchin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors.

Authors:  Marko Rohlfs
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  The value of patch-choice copying in fruit flies.

Authors:  Shane Golden; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamics of social behavior in fruit fly larvae.

Authors:  Zachary Durisko; Rebecca Kemp; Rameeshay Mubasher; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.