Literature DB >> 1523245

Hedonic response of sucrose likers and dislikers to other gustatory stimuli.

H Looy1, S Callaghan, H P Weingarten.   

Abstract

The majority of individuals can be classified as sweet likers or dislikers based on their hedonic (pleasure) response to sucrose solutions of varying concentrations. Our results indicate that the sweet liker/disliker distinction generalizes to sugars other than sucrose, i.e., glucose and fructose. As well, these individual hedonic response patterns are maintained even when a flavor and color are added to sucrose solutions. However, whether one is a sweet liker or disliker does not predict hedonic response to nonsweet tastes such as salt. These results indicate that the sweet liker/disliker distinction is a robust phenomenon which appears to generalize over, but is restricted to, sweet-tasting substances. The possibility that individual differences in hedonic response may predict preferences for, and intake of, complex tastes characteristic of foods encountered in the real world, is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1523245     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90261-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  15 in total

Review 1.  Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives.

Authors:  Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Howard R Moskowitz; Derek J Snyder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Type of milk typically consumed, and stated preference, but not health consciousness affect revealed preferences for fat in milk.

Authors:  Alyssa J Bakke; Catherine V Shehan; John E Hayes
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.565

3.  Genetics of sweet taste preferences.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Wely B Floriano; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Cailu Lin; Vladimir O Murovets; Danielle R Reed; Vasily A Zolotarev; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 4.  The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception.

Authors:  S W Guo; D R Reed
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Sweet taste pleasantness is modulated by morphine and naltrexone.

Authors:  Marie Eikemo; Guro E Løseth; Tom Johnstone; Johannes Gjerstad; Frode Willoch; Siri Leknes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Hunger and negative alliesthesia to aspartame and sucrose in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs and controls.

Authors:  Y Khazaal; A Chatton; F Claeys; F Ribordy; R Khan; D Zullino
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.652

7.  Sweet liking phenotype, alcohol craving and response to naltrexone treatment in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  James C Garbutt; Michael Osborne; Robert Gallop; John Barkenbus; Kathy Grace; Meghan Cody; Barbara Flannery; Alexey B Kampov-Polevoy
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.826

8.  A marker of growth differs between adolescents with high vs. low sugar preference.

Authors:  Susan E Coldwell; Teresa K Oswald; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-12-31

9.  The human sweet tooth.

Authors:  Danielle R Reed; Amanda H McDaniel
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 10.  Behavioral genetics and taste.

Authors:  John D Boughter; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.