Literature DB >> 15231373

Aortic stiffness and diameter predict progressive aortic dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome.

Gijs J Nollen1, Maarten Groenink, Jan G P Tijssen, Ernst E Van Der Wall, Barbara J M Mulder.   

Abstract

AIM: Patients with Marfan syndrome may develop dissection due to progressive dilatation in the entire aorta, which is not always predictable by mere anatomic assessment of the aortic diameter, especially of the descending aorta. The aim of this study was to identify the predictive value of aortic stiffness on the occurrence of dissection and progressive aortic dilatation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 78 non-operated patients with Marfan syndrome (mean age 31+/-8 years, mean aortic root diameter 43+/-6 mm, range 31-55 mm) aortic stiffness and diameters were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at multiple levels. After a median follow-up of 71 months (25-75%: 68-72 months) a second MRI was performed and the incidence of aortic dissection and progressive aortic dilatation, defined as mean aortic diameter increase >1 mm/year was determined. During follow-up, 4 (5%) of 78 patients developed an aortic dissection (1 type A, 2 type B, and 1 infra-renal dissection). Twenty (26%) of the 78 patients had progressive aortic root dilatation. There were 5 (6%) patients with progressive descending thoracic aortic dilatation and 6 (7%) with progressive abdominal aortic dilatation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that local distensibility was an independent predictor of progressive thoracic descending aortic dilatation (OR=4.14, 95% CI, 1.02-16.7). For progressive aortic root and abdominal aortic dilatation local initial diameter appeared to be the major predictor (OR=1.37, 95% CI, 1.16-1.62; OR=1.36, 95% CI, 1.09-1.69, respectively).
CONCLUSION: In patients with Marfan syndrome both aortic diameter and aortic distensibility are independent predictors of progressive aortic dilatation. For optimal risk assessment and monitoring of patients with Marfan syndrome, both aortic stiffness and diameter should be assessed at least annually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15231373     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  65 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance angiography for anatomical evaluation of the great arteries.

Authors:  T Oosterhof; B J M Mulder
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Variability of aortic stiffness is not associated with the fibrillin 1 genotype in patients with Marfan's syndrome.

Authors:  J De Backer; G J Nollen; D Devos; G Pals; P Coucke; K Verstraete; E E van der Wall; A De Paepe; B J M Mulder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Beyond the root: dilatation of the distal aorta in Marfan's syndrome.

Authors:  P M Engelfriet; E Boersma; J G P Tijssen; B J Bouma; B J M Mulder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Age-dependent changes in elastic properties of thoracic aorta evaluated by magnetic resonance in normal subjects.

Authors:  Giovanni Donato Aquaro; Alessandro Cagnolo; Kaushal Kumar Tiwari; Giancarlo Todiere; Stefano Bevilacqua; Gianluca Di Bella; Lamia Ait-Ali; Pierluigi Festa; Mattia Glauber; Massimo Lombardi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-12

5.  Progressive aortic dilation and aortic stiffness in children with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Mitsuru Seki; Clara Kurishima; Hirofumi Saiki; Satoshi Masutani; Hirokazu Arakawa; Masanori Tamura; Hideaki Senzaki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Coupling between MRI-assessed regional aortic pulse wave velocity and diameters in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm: a feasibility study.

Authors:  E S J Kröner; J J M Westenberg; L J M Kroft; N J Brouwer; P J van den Boogaard; A J H A Scholte
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Abnormal aortic stiffness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: phenotypic variation determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Thananya Boonyasirinant; Prabhakar Rajiah; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Arterial stiffness in the young: assessment, determinants, and implications.

Authors:  Yiu-Fai Cheung
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Aortic elasticity indices by magnetic resonance predict progression of ascending aorta dilation.

Authors:  Giovanni Donato Aquaro; Alessandra Briatico Vangosa; Patrizia Toia; Andrea Barison; Lamia Ait-Ali; Massimo Midiri; Antonio Raffaele Cotroneo; Michele Emdin; Pierluigi Festa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Normal values for aortic diameters in children and adolescents--assessment in vivo by contrast-enhanced CMR-angiography.

Authors:  Thomas Kaiser; Christian J Kellenberger; Manuela Albisetti; Eva Bergsträsser; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.