Literature DB >> 15231013

Risk-benefit profile for raloxifene: 4-year data From the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) randomized trial.

Elizabeth Barrett-Connor1, Jane A Cauley, Pandurang M Kulkarni, Andreas Sashegyi, David A Cox, Mary Jane Geiger.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Posthoc analysis of the MORE osteoporosis treatment trial assessed risk-benefit profile of raloxifene in 7705 postmenopausal women. A major disease outcomes global index resulted in annual rates of 1.39% and 1.83% in the raloxifene and placebo groups, respectively (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92), compatible with a favorable risk-benefit profile for raloxifene for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.
INTRODUCTION: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial reported overall risks that exceeded benefits from use of estrogen-progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. The objective of this posthoc analysis of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial was to assess the safety profile of raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator indicated for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, using the global index method from the WHI trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7705 postmenopausal women (mean age, 67 years) were enrolled in the MORE osteoporosis treatment trial and randomly assigned to receive placebo or one of two doses of raloxifene (60 or 120 mg/day) for 4 years. A global index of clinical outcomes, defined as described for the WHI trial (the earliest occurrence of coronary heart disease, stroke, pulmonary embolism, invasive breast cancer, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, or death because of other causes) was applied to the MORE trial data. Physicians blinded to treatment assignment adjudicated events. Intention-to-treat survival analysis of time-to-first-event was performed using a proportional hazards model. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The annualized rate of global index events was 1.83% in the placebo group and 1.39% in the combined raloxifene dose groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92). Analyzing individual dose groups separately yielded the same results (HR for 60 mg/day, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96: HR for 120 mg/day, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95). Subgroup analyses showed no significant interactions between age or hysterectomy status and the effect of raloxifene on the global index (interaction p > 0.1), whereas the global index risk reduction seemed to be greater in obese women compared with nonobese women (interaction p = 0.03). The significant 25% reduction in global index is compatible with a favorable risk-benefit safety profile when raloxifene is used for osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women. These results require confirmation in ongoing clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15231013     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.040406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  10 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporotic fractures in older adults.

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 2.  Treatment of osteoporosis and reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with raloxifene.

Authors:  Seung Sang Ko; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.889

3.  Do estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulators improve quality of life for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis?

Authors:  Deborah T Gold; Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  What is the best balance of benefits and risks among anti-resorptive therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis?

Authors:  P D Miller; R J Derman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Long-term safety and efficacy of raloxifene in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: an update.

Authors:  Enrico M Messalli; Cono Scaffa
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 6.  The NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) trial.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.512

7.  American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on the use of pharmacologic interventions including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition for breast cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Kala Visvanathan; Rowan T Chlebowski; Patricia Hurley; Nananda F Col; Mary Ropka; Deborah Collyar; Monica Morrow; Carolyn Runowicz; Kathleen I Pritchard; Karen Hagerty; Banu Arun; Judy Garber; Victor G Vogel; James L Wade; Powel Brown; Jack Cuzick; Barnett S Kramer; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Extraskeletal benefits and risks of calcium, vitamin D and anti-osteoporosis medications.

Authors:  J-J Body; P Bergmann; S Boonen; J-P Devogelaer; E Gielen; S Goemaere; J-M Kaufman; S Rozenberg; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Managing the risk of invasive breast cancer in women at risk for breast cancer and osteoporosis: the role of raloxifene.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 10.  Alendronate versus Raloxifene for Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis of Seven Head-to-Head Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Tiao Lin; Shi-Gui Yan; Xun-Zi Cai; Zhi-Min Ying; Fu-Zhen Yuan; Xi Zuo
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.257

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.