Literature DB >> 15231012

Randomized trial of effect of alendronate continuation versus discontinuation in women with low BMD: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial long-term extension.

Kristine E Ensrud1, Elizabeth L Barrett-Connor, Ann Schwartz, Arthur C Santora, Douglas C Bauer, Shailaja Suryawanshi, Adrianne Feldstein, William L Haskell, Marc C Hochberg, James C Torner, Antonio Lombardi, Dennis M Black.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To determine the effects of continuation versus discontinuation of alendronate on BMD and markers of bone turnover, we conducted an extension trial in which 1099 older women who received alendronate in the FIT were re-randomized to alendronate or placebo. Compared with women who stopped alendronate, those continuing alendronate for 3 years maintained a higher BMD and greater reduction of bone turnover, showing benefit of continued treatment. However, among women who discontinued alendronate and took placebo in the extension, BMD remained higher, and reduction in bone turnover was greater than values at FIT baseline, showing persistence of alendronate's effects on bone.
INTRODUCTION: Prior trials including the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) have found that therapy with alendronate increases BMD and decreases fracture risk for up to 4 years in postmenopausal women with low BMD. However, it is uncertain whether further therapy with alendronate results in preservation or further gains in BMD and if skeletal effects of alendronate continue after treatment is stopped.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a follow-up placebo-controlled extension trial to FIT (FIT long-term extension [FLEX]) in which 1099 women 60-86 years of age who were assigned to alendronate in FIT with an average duration of use of 5 years were re-randomized for an additional 5 years to alendronate or placebo. The results of a preplanned interim analysis at 3 years are reported herein. Participants were re-randomized to alendronate 10 mg/day (30%), alendronate 5 mg/day (30%), or placebo (40%). All participants were encouraged to take a calcium (500 mg/day) and vitamin D (250 IU/day) supplement. The primary outcome was change in total hip BMD. Secondary endpoints included change in lumbar spine BMD and change in markers of bone turnover (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urinary type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide).
RESULTS: Among the women who had prior alendronate therapy in FIT, further therapy with alendronate (5 and 10 mg groups combined) for 3 years compared with placebo maintained BMD at the hip (2.0% difference; 95% CI, 1.6-2.5%) and further increased BMD at the spine (2.5% difference; 95% CI, 1.9-3. 1%). Markers of bone turnover increased among women discontinuing alendronate, whereas they remained stable in women continuing alendronate. Cumulative increases in BMD at the hip and spine and reductions in bone turnover from 8.6 years earlier at FIT baseline were greater for women continuing alendronate compared with those discontinuing alendronate. However, among women discontinuing alendronate and taking placebo in the extension, BMD remained higher and reduction in bone turnover was greater than values at FIT baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with women who stopped alendronate after an average of 5 years, those continuing alendronate maintained a higher BMD and greater reduction of bone turnover, showing benefit of continued alendronate treatment on BMD and bone turnover. On discontinuation of alendronate therapy, rates of change in BMD at the hip and spine resumed at the background rate, but discontinuation did not result in either accelerated bone loss or a marked increase in bone turnover, showing persistence of alendronate's effects on bone. Data on the effect of continuation versus discontinuation on fracture risk are needed before making definitive recommendations regarding the optimal length of alendronate treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15231012     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.040326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  76 in total

Review 1.  Bone turnover markers: use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kim Naylor; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Subtrochanteric femoral insufficiency fractures related to the use of long-term bisphosphonates: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Nanda Venkatanarasimha; Gemma Miles; Priya Suresh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-07-20

Review 3.  Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Robert A Adler; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Douglas C Bauer; Pauline M Camacho; Bart L Clarke; Gregory A Clines; Juliet E Compston; Matthew T Drake; Beatrice J Edwards; Murray J Favus; Susan L Greenspan; Ross McKinney; Robert J Pignolo; Deborah E Sellmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Pelvic insufficiency fracture associated with severe suppression of bone turnover by alendronate therapy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imai; Seizo Yamamoto; Yorito Anamizu; Toshiyuki Horiuchi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A model of fracture risk used to examine the link between bone mineral density and the impact of different therapeutic mechanisms on fracture outcomes in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Rena J Eudy-Byrne; William Gillespie; Matthew M Riggs; Marc R Gastonguay
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of bisphosphonate drug holidays on bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture risk.

Authors:  S Nayak; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Effect of once-yearly zoledronic acid five milligrams on fracture risk and change in femoral neck bone mineral density.

Authors:  Richard Eastell; Dennis M Black; Steven Boonen; Silvano Adami; Dieter Felsenberg; Kurt Lippuner; Steven R Cummings; Pierre D Delmas; Lisa Palermo; Peter Mesenbrink; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  E M Dennison; C Cooper; J A Kanis; O Bruyère; S Silverman; E McCloskey; B Abrahamsen; D Prieto-Alhambra; S Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction in cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  T Hasegawa; S Hayashida; E Kondo; Y Takeda; H Miyamoto; Y Kawaoka; N Ueda; E Iwata; H Nakahara; M Kobayashi; S Soutome; S I Yamada; I Tojyo; Y Kojima; M Umeda; S Fujita; H Kurita; Y Shibuya; T Kirita; T Komori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Osteoporosis: "A risk factor for periodontitis".

Authors:  Rekha Rani Koduganti; Chandana Gorthi; P Veerendranath Reddy; N Sandeep
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2009-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.