Literature DB >> 15230966

Measuring changes in articulate brachiopod morphology before and after the Permian mass extinction event: do developmental constraints limit morphological innovation?

Charles N Ciampaglio1.   

Abstract

The pattern of decreasing disparity has been observed in both the metazoans and metaphytes throughout the Phanerozoic. The pattern is manifest as a decreasing trend in the origination of higher taxa. Currently, two competing evolutionary hypotheses have been proposed to explain this phenomenon: the empty ecospace hypothesis and the developmental constraint hypothesis. To empirically distinguish between these hypotheses, the change in disparity before and after the end-Permian mass extinction event was measured in the articulated brachiopods. The assumption is that ecospace-limiting constraints are removed after mass extinctions revealing the effect of developmental constraints. For each taxon within the group, both continuous and discrete character sets were analyzed. Four different measures of disparity were used to analyze each character suite. Additionally, a separate analysis was performed on a subset of the articulated brachiopods, the rhynchonellids and terebratulids. In most cases investigated, disparity rebounded to comparable levels, with the rhynchonellids and terebratulids showing the largest increase in disparity after the end-Permian extinction, a clear example of an increase in disparity without a significant increase in taxonomic diversity. The results indicate that developmental constraints may not be responsible for the decreasing disparity in this group. The more likely scenario is that increasingly structured ecological guilds have made it much more difficult for large increases in disparity to occur.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230966     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2004.04031.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  5 in total

1.  Graptoloid diversity and disparity became decoupled during the Ordovician mass extinction.

Authors:  David W Bapst; Peter C Bullock; Michael J Melchin; H David Sheets; Charles E Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  What limits the morphological disparity of clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Peter J Wagner; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Evolutionary patterns in early tetrapods. II. Differing constraints on available character space among clades.

Authors:  Peter J Wagner; Marcello Ruta; Michael I Coates
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Colloquium paper: extinction as the loss of evolutionary history.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal.

Authors:  David Ackerly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.