Literature DB >> 15230482

Effect of contrast enhancement on measurement of carotid artery intimal medial thickness.

James E Macioch1, C Dean Katsamakis, Jason Robin, Philip R Liebson, Peter M Meyer, Chris Geohas, Joel S Raichlen, Michael H Davidson, Steven B Feinstein.   

Abstract

Previous studies have used standard B-mode ultrasound to quantify the aggregate mean intimal medial thickness (IMT) of the near and far wall of the common carotid artery (CCA). Many investigators have had difficulty in accurately evaluating the near wall IMT secondary to difficulty in discerning the vessel lumen and intima. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of contrast enhanced ultrasound on IMT measurement when compared with non-enhanced images. Twenty-six patients who had standard carotid ultrasounds completed over a 6-month period were evaluated, with 24 imaged by the same sonographer. Five to six measurements of the near and far walls were obtained over a 1 cm distance, beginning and ending 0.5 cm and 1.5 cm proximal to the carotid bifurcation. The measurements were made with and without the contrast agent Optison (perflutren protein type-A microspheres), which was given as an i.v. bolus (0.5-0.7 cc). Of those imaged by the same sonographer, 40 carotid arteries were examined and a total of 867 measurements were obtained. A total of 10% of the carotid ultrasounds were restudied approximately 1 month after the initial interpretation to assess observer accuracy. The near wall CCA mean (SD) IMT was 0.075 (0.019) cm for left with contrast versus 0.067 (0.023) cm for left without contrast and 0.089 (0.024) cm for right with versus 0.071 (0.022) cm for right without, p < or = 0.0001 both sides. For the far wall of the CCA, the mean (SD) IMT comparison was 0.075 (0.021) cm for left with versus 0.070 (0.016) cm for left without, p = 0.005, and 0.070 (0.023) cm for right with versus 0.070 (0.016) cm for right without, p = 0.68. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced IMT measurement showed a highly statistically significant difference in near carotid wall thickness determinations versus non-contrast values. The thicker measurement is in agreement with previously reported data showing that non-contrast images underestimated near wall common carotid IMT in histologic samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230482     DOI: 10.1191/1358863x04vm522oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Med        ISSN: 1358-863X            Impact factor:   3.239


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of carotid intimal thickness and plaque imaging in risk stratification for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Smita I Negi; Vijay Nambi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  New advances in noninvasive imaging of the carotid artery: CIMT, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and vasa vasorum.

Authors:  Blai Coll; Vijay Nambi; Steven B Feinstein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Carotid intima-media thickness measurements: techniques and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Blai Coll; Steven B Feinstein
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Steven B Feinstein; Blai Coll; Daniel Staub; Dan Adam; Arend F L Schinkel; Folkert J ten Cate; Kai Thomenius
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Associations of Coronary Heart Disease with Common Carotid Artery Near and Far Wall Intima-Media Thickness: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Joseph F Polak; Moyses Szklo; Daniel H O'Leary
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque stability with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Li Xiong; Youbin Deng; Xiaojun Bi; Ying Zhu; Weihui Shentu; Fen Yu; Yun Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24

Review 7.  Noninvasive assessment of preclinical atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Helen A Lane; Jamie C Smith; J Stephen Davies
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2006

8.  The therapeuatic effect of Endostar on soft carotid plaque neovascularization in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Pu; Yao Wang; Ying Zhang; Jing Huang; Yurong Hong; Huiliao He; Chunmei Liu; Shuyuan Chen; Paul A Grayburn; Pintong Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Detection of Atherosclerotic Plaques in the Rabbit Aorta Using Ultrasound Microbubbles Conjugated to Interleukin-18 Antibodies.

Authors:  Zhen-Zhen Jiang; Xia-Tian Liu; Cai-Ye Ma; Cong He; Xing-Yun Li; Chuan-Lin Hou; Zu-Sheng Cheng; Guo-Yuan Xia
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-11-16

Review 10.  Ultrasound Methods in the Evaluation of Atherosclerosis: From Pathophysiology to Clinic.

Authors:  Gabriel Cismaru; Teodora Serban; Alexandru Tirpe
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-04-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.