Literature DB >> 15230144

[Whole body versus segmental bioimpedance measurements (BIS) of electrical resistance (Re) and extracellular volume (ECV) for assessment of dry weight in end-stage renal patients treated by hemodialysis].

Wojciech Załuska1, Teresa Małecka, Sławomir Mozul, Andrzej Ksiazek.   

Abstract

The precise estimation of the hydration status of the human body has a great meaning in the assessment of dry weight in end-stage renal disease patients treated by hemodialysis. The bioimpedance technique (BIS) is postulated as easy in use and as a non-invasive method in monitoring the size of hydrate space such as total body water (TBW) and extracellular volume (ECV). However, the precision of the method (Whole Body Bioimpedance Technique) has been questioned in several research papers. One of the problems lies in fluid transfer from peripheral spaces (limbs) to the central space (trunk) while changing the position of the body (orthostatic effect). This phenomena can be eliminated using segmental bioimpedance technique (4200 Hydra, Analyzer, Xitron, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). The purpose of the study was to estimate the changes of electrical resistance (Re) the extracellular volume (ECV) at the time -pre, and -post 10 hemodialysis sessions using whole body bioimpedance technique (WBIS) in comparison to BIS measurements in specific segments of the body; arm (ECVarm), leg (ECVleg), trunk (ECVtrunk). The sum of changes in extracellular volume (ECV) in segments (2ECVarm+ ECVtrunk + 2ECVleg) was 13.26 +/- 1.861 L in comparison to 17.29 +/- 2.07 L (p < 0.01) as measured by WBIS technique at the time before HD. The changes in electrical resistance Re was of 558 +/- 68 W as calculated from the sum of segments versus 560 +/- 70 W (p < 0.05) as measured by WBIS. At the time after hemodialysis the sum of segmental ECV volume measurement was of 11.42 +/- 1.28 L in comparison to 14.84 +/- 1.31 (p < 0.001) from WBIS the whole body technique (WBIS) and changes in electrical resistance Re was of 674 +/- 67 W as calculated from the sum of segments versus 677 +/- 64 (p < 0.05) W respectively. The observed difference between the identical electrical resistance Re as measured by WBIS in comparison to the sum of segment measurements and important difference between ECV volume as measured by WBIS versus sum of segment ECV measurements can be partly explain by non-cylindric nature of human body composition. However, the segmental bio-impedance technique is a method which gives us more accurate data about the extracellular volume taken from each segment in the hemodialysis patient but the accuracy of trunk water assessment is still a problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Przegl Lek        ISSN: 0033-2240


  4 in total

1.  Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Gabriela Almeida; Jorge Bravo; Hugo Folgado; Hugo Rosado; Felismina Mendes; Catarina Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Key factor cutoffs and interval reference values for stratified fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults: the role of physical fitness, body composition, physical activity, health condition, and environmental hazards.

Authors:  Catarina Pereira; Guida Veiga; Gabriela Almeida; Ana Rita Matias; Ana Cruz-Ferreira; Felismina Mendes; Jorge Bravo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Aging safely in Alentejo - understanding for action - preventing falls and violence against older people: study rationale, aims, design, and preliminary results.

Authors:  Catarina Pereira; Jorge Bravo; Gorete Reis; Felismina Mendes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Characteristics of bioimpedance-determined fluid shifts according to intradialytic blood pressure difference.

Authors:  Young Eun Kwon; Hye Min Choi; Dong-Jin Oh
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.