K Källén1. 1. Tornblad Institute, University of Lund, Sweden. karin.kallen@anatom.lu.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate if there is an association between perinatal/neonatal death and a discrepancy between gestational age by ultrasound fetometry in early pregnancy (GA(U)) and gestational age by last menstrual period (GA(LMP)), and to investigate possible causes for such an association. METHODS: The Swedish Medical Birth Registry was used to identify singleton pregnancies with information available on GA(LMP) and GA(U) that were delivered in Sweden between 1990 and 2000. A total of 718 011 pregnancies was included and information on the pregnancy and delivery was obtained from the National Board of Health. RESULTS: Infants with a GA(U) at least 7 days less than the GA(LMP) were at increased risk for stillbirth (odds ratio (OR), 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.58), neonatal death within 1 month (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.67-2.09), Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.24), birth weight < 2500 g (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.43-1.52), and preterm birth < 37 weeks (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.42-1.49). The association between a postponed expected date of delivery and perinatal/neonatal death increased with gestational length and was especially pronounced among infants who were born after at least 40 completed weeks of pregnancy (GA(U)). CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy between GA(U) and GA(LMP) may indicate early disturbances in fetal/placental development. Furthermore, it can be speculated that, as the risk significantly increased with gestational duration, at least a part of the increased risk for poor pregnancy outcome in adjusted pregnancies was due to consequences of true post-term pregnancies not being recognized as such. Copyright 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate if there is an association between perinatal/neonatal death and a discrepancy between gestational age by ultrasound fetometry in early pregnancy (GA(U)) and gestational age by last menstrual period (GA(LMP)), and to investigate possible causes for such an association. METHODS: The Swedish Medical Birth Registry was used to identify singleton pregnancies with information available on GA(LMP) and GA(U) that were delivered in Sweden between 1990 and 2000. A total of 718 011 pregnancies was included and information on the pregnancy and delivery was obtained from the National Board of Health. RESULTS:Infants with a GA(U) at least 7 days less than the GA(LMP) were at increased risk for stillbirth (odds ratio (OR), 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.58), neonatal death within 1 month (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.67-2.09), Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.24), birth weight < 2500 g (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.43-1.52), and preterm birth < 37 weeks (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.42-1.49). The association between a postponed expected date of delivery and perinatal/neonatal death increased with gestational length and was especially pronounced among infants who were born after at least 40 completed weeks of pregnancy (GA(U)). CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy between GA(U) and GA(LMP) may indicate early disturbances in fetal/placental development. Furthermore, it can be speculated that, as the risk significantly increased with gestational duration, at least a part of the increased risk for poor pregnancy outcome in adjusted pregnancies was due to consequences of true post-term pregnancies not being recognized as such. Copyright 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Nils-Halvdan Morken; Rolv Skjaerven; Jennifer L Richards; Michael R Kramer; Sven Cnattingius; Stefan Johansson; Mika Gissler; Siobhan M Dolan; Jennifer Zeitlin; Michael S Kramer Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Kriti Puri; Carri R Warshak; Mounira A Habli; Amy Yuan; Rashmi D Sahay; Eileen C King; Allison Divanovic; James F Cnota Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Marija Simic; Olof Stephansson; Gunnar Petersson; Sven Cnattingius; Anna-Karin Wikström Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lalit K Sharma; Jyoti Bindal; Vishal A Shrivastava; Mansi Sharma; Rijo M Choorakuttil; Praveen K Nirmalan Journal: Indian J Radiol Imaging Date: 2020-03-30
Authors: Synnøve L Johnsen; Tom Wilsgaard; Svein Rasmussen; Mark A Hanson; Keith M Godfrey; Torvid Kiserud Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2008-07-16 Impact factor: 3.007