Literature DB >> 15229882

A simple topological representation of protein structure: implications for new, fast, and robust structural classification.

David L Bostick1, Min Shen, Iosif I Vaisman.   

Abstract

A topological representation of proteins is developed that makes use of two metrics: the Euclidean metric for identifying natural nearest neighboring residues via the Delaunay tessellation in Cartesian space and the distance between residues in sequence space. Using this representation, we introduce a quantitative and computationally inexpensive method for the comparison of protein structural topology. The method ultimately results in a numerical score quantifying the distance between proteins in a heuristically defined topological space. The properties of this scoring scheme are investigated and correlated with the standard Calpha distance root-mean-square deviation measure of protein similarity calculated by rigid body structural alignment. The topological comparison method is shown to have a characteristic dependence on protein conformational differences and secondary structure. This distinctive behavior is also observed in the comparison of proteins within families of structural relatives. The ability of the comparison method to successfully classify proteins into classes, superfamilies, folds, and families that are consistent with standard classification methods, both automated and human-driven, is demonstrated. Furthermore, it is shown that the scoring method allows for a fine-grained classification on the family, protein, and species level that agrees very well with currently established phylogenetic hierarchies. This fine classification is achieved without requiring visual inspection of proteins, sequence analysis, or the use of structural superimposition methods. Implications of the method for a fast, automated, topological hierarchical classification of proteins are discussed. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15229882     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  9 in total

1.  Evolution of structural shape in bacterial globin-related proteins.

Authors:  Lorraine Marsh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Comparison between Generalized-Born and Poisson-Boltzmann methods in physics-based scoring functions for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Matthew C Lee; Rong Yang; Yong Duan
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  An amino acid code for irregular and mixed protein packing.

Authors:  Hyun Joo; Archana G Chavan; Keith J Fraga; Jerry Tsai
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-10-05

4.  Discrimination of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins.

Authors:  Todd J Taylor; Iosif I Vaisman
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-05-17

5.  Scoring function to predict solubility mutagenesis.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Christopher Deutsch; Bala Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 1.405

6.  Assessment of CASP10 contact-assisted predictions.

Authors:  Todd J Taylor; Hongjun Bai; Chin-Hsien Tai; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

7.  Protein structure similarity from Principle Component Correlation analysis.

Authors:  Xiaobo Zhou; James Chou; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Progress in the PRIDE technique for rapidly comparing protein three-dimensional structures.

Authors:  Svetlana Kirillova; Oliviero Carugo
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-07-11

9.  Structural footprinting in protein structure comparison: the impact of structural fragments.

Authors:  Elena Zotenko; Rezarta Islamaj Dogan; W John Wilbur; Dianne P O'Leary; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2007-08-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.